Re: [tz] Proposed reversions, for moving forward

Stephen Colebourne wrote:

Simply ploughing on with the changes, just in smaller batches, does not actually make the objectors happy

It doesn't make *me* happy either. I'd prefer doing these cleanups all at once to get them over with, but I'm willing to live with doing them more gradually, they way they've been done for many years. No end-user problems have been reported in all that time, and there's no reason to expect significant problems in the future as we continue to muck out the stables. Given the above, if you'd also prefer to get it over with, then we can do that too (but in a later release of course).