Oct. 15, 2014
2:57 a.m.
Tim Parenti wrote:
I think it's important, at least for -c, to clarify exactly what is meant by "inclusive" and "exclusive". Proposed further patch attached.
That patch is wordy and the wordiness gets in the way of clarity. I think its basic idea can be expressed more concisely by adding a few words to the example, as in the attached.