On Wed, 16 Mar 2022, Tim Parenti via tz wrote:
On Wed, 16 Mar 2022 at 11:10, John Sauter via tz <tz@iana.org> wrote:
The problem, of course, is that we won't know ahead of time what abbreviations to use. A reasonable guess, however, is that people will continue to use whatever abbreviations they have been using.
Complicating matters somewhat is that, because of the prevalence of tzdb, in a sense we're "victims of our own success". That is, whatever we end up picking will likely show up fairly automatically in a lot of public-facing places, and so even if it isn't what the public would've naturally used in the immediate aftermath of a change, many will be fairly quickly informed by what they start to see, and may start adopting and spreading whatever nomenclature we've picked.
Let's get really creative (and confusing) and switch to PSDT, MSDT, CSDT, and ESDT Oh, no, that means we'd end up back in the business of inventing zone abbreviations. :) So maybe we switch to <+n> nomenclature until boots-on-the-ground can provide more-or-less definitive "common usage" abbreviations. +--------------------+--------------------------+----------------------+ | Paul Goyette | PGP Key fingerprint: | E-mail addresses: | | (Retired) | FA29 0E3B 35AF E8AE 6651 | paul@whooppee.com | | Software Developer | 0786 F758 55DE 53BA 7731 | pgoyette@netbsd.org | | & Network Engineer | | pgoyette99@gmail.com | +--------------------+--------------------------+----------------------+