Re: [tz] "Standard byte order"

Nov. 4, 2011

      LOL. Two standards. That's a good one, Marshall.

I did see the bit about high-order byte, but had never heard that term
before, but Google shows it is used. 

-----Original Message-----
From: Marshall Eubanks [mailto:marshall.eubanks@gmail.com] 
Sent: Friday, November 04, 2011 10:39 AM
To: Thom Hehl
Cc: tz@iana.org
Subject: Re: [tz] "Standard byte order"

On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 10:27 AM, Thom Hehl <Thom@pointsix.com> wrote:
...
I'm assuming that "Standard byte order" referred to over and over in
the
docs means Most Significant Byte first?
It should really be documented that way. As far as I know, there is no
standard byte order.
Well, of course, actually there are two. And that's why it needs to be
specified.

Regards
Marshall
...