On 13/08/15 17:21, Eric Erhardt wrote:
Notice the first entry is for 1970, and then the next entry is for 1883. This breaks the documentation in 'man tzfile':
The first entry was probably a 'null' timestamp? And the software has to display a valid date for which the current 'default' is used. I see this sort of problem often when looking at genealogical data where '0' has been used as an unknown date. The results depend on just which date processing software is being used ... -- Lester Caine - G8HFL ----------------------------- Contact - http://lsces.co.uk/wiki/?page=contact L.S.Caine Electronic Services - http://lsces.co.uk EnquirySolve - http://enquirysolve.com/ Model Engineers Digital Workshop - http://medw.co.uk Rainbow Digital Media - http://rainbowdigitalmedia.co.uk