Aug. 1, 2006
11:47 p.m.
Arthur Olson, Thank you ever so much for you kind help and assistance. I appreciate it greatly. Regards, David Lawless At 01:43 PM 7/31/2006 -0400, Olson, Arthur David \(NIH/NCI\) [E] wrote:
The bad news is that there is indeed a code problem; the good news is that it was only introduced back in February of this year (with the first 64-bit-version release).
The fix should be to move the zeroing of sp->timecnt; the suggested patch below incorporates both that change and a fix for last week's report on bad goahead/goback logic. (I've chosen the path of minimal change in both cases).