Dec. 3, 2003
5:41 p.m.
On Wed, 3 Dec 2003, Olson, Arthur David (NIH/NCI) wrote:
Another possibility is to change the spelling of... 24:00 ...to... 23:59:60 ...which works with any version of zic issued 1988 or later. Let's hear it for leap seconds!
Please don't do this. This is a bogus time, because there is no leap second at that time. 24:00 makes a lot more sense. Plus my parsing code already handles it and I don't want to have to make more changes ;) -dave /*======================= House Absolute Consulting www.houseabsolute.com =======================*/