Boruch Baum wrote:
It's a double bug. It's printing out a non-existent timezone, and it's using GMT for "Asia"
It's well-known behaviour. It's part of libc, not date per se, as you can see through (for example) ls's display of file timestamps: $ TZ=UTC date; TZ=Europe/Paris date; TZ=Foo/Bar date Tue Jun 19 21:04:33 UTC 2012 Tue Jun 19 23:04:33 CEST 2012 Tue Jun 19 21:04:33 Foo 2012 $ touch foo; TZ=UTC ls -l --full-time foo; TZ=Europe/Paris ls -l --full-time foo; TZ=Foo/Bar ls -l --full-time foo; -rw-rw-r-- 1 zefram zefram 0 2012-06-19 21:04:43.105251376 +0000 foo -rw-rw-r-- 1 zefram zefram 0 2012-06-19 23:04:43.105251376 +0200 foo -rw-rw-r-- 1 zefram zefram 0 2012-06-19 21:04:43.105251376 +0000 foo Finding that Foo/Bar or Asia/Moscow doesn't exist in the timezone database, libc tries to interpret it as a POSIX timezone specification. It's not actually well-formed as a POSIX timezone specification, but it tries the best it can to interpret it anyway. In this case, the "/" causes a parse error and so the specification is being truncated there. (Some implementations don't truncate it, and you get the whole "Foo/Bar" or whatever as the abbreviation in the date output.) The simplest form of POSIX timezone specification consists of an abbreviation followed by an offset; in this case the offset is missing, so libc is treating it as a zero offset. The result is that "Foo/Bar" acts like the valid POSIX timezone spec "Foo0", meaning a fixed offset of zero hours from UT with abbreviation "Foo". It would be better if libc could reject this $TZ value, rather than making this futile attempt to make sense of it, but the historical API has very little scope to signal errors, and backward compatibility is a bitch. So you're stuck with this behaviour. Just learn the lesson from it: don't make any new API or library be this forgiving with bad input. -zefram