On Thu 2016-12-08T16:35:15 -0700, Brian Inglis hath writ:
No worries - thought that might be case - didn't want possibly spurious ref cited as a summary in distributed files - URI year made me suspicious - those guys have published a fair amount on the same topics over the decades - seem like pretty rigorous treatments - Canon/NASA summary polynomials appeared less uniform than the authors' current tables.
Except that Morrison and Stephenson and Hohenkerk only show the past. NASA polynomials attempt to predict the future, but (as seen in the data of this new publication) to their peril. -- Steve Allen <sla@ucolick.org> WGS-84 (GPS) UCO/Lick Observatory--ISB 260 Natural Sciences II, Room 165 Lat +36.99855 1156 High Street Voice: +1 831 459 3046 Lng -122.06015 Santa Cruz, CA 95064 http://www.ucolick.org/~sla/ Hgt +250 m