Since they are the same thing, one is just an older name, why does this matter? If you want to use a single consistent term, sure, stick to UTC. But other than that, if you say GMT you mean the same time as if you say UTC. paul -----Original Message----- From: Clive D.W. Feather [mailto:clive@davros.org] Sent: Friday, September 23, 2011 5:25 PM To: tz@lecserver.nci.nih.gov Cc: tz@lecserver.nci.nih.gov Subject: Re: UTC as basis for time legislation Tobias Conradi said:
It would be interesting to find reliable indicators about whether UTC or GMT is the basis in any given region. Even recently I've seen official decrees using the geographic terms "meridian" and "Greenwich".
UTC used in EU law to define the start and end of summer-time:
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:C:2011:083:00 06:01:EN:HTML
I've done this before: there's a horrible mix of GMT and UT in the different translations of that Directive, including some ambiguous cases. And the translations don't necessarily match the legal times in the countries using those languages. -- Clive D.W. Feather | If you lie to the compiler, Email: clive@davros.org | it will get its revenge. Web: http://www.davros.org | - Henry Spencer Mobile: +44 7973 377646