I would tend to agree on the NSEW split that the UN has, for some cases, in particular for Europe. Looking at http://www.unicode.org/cldr/data/diff/supplemental/supplemental.html, for example, they put the UK and Latvia in Northern Europe, while some might put the UK in Western and Latvia in Eastern. On the other hand, where someone did want to have a more manageable hierarchy of shorter lists in their UI, it might be a reasonable choice to start with the UN list. There is nothing to prevent a UI from using mutiple territory containments. For example, one might list Turkey under both Asia and Europe, so that it would appear in both lists. Mark ----- Original Message ----- From: "Clive D.W. Feather" <clive@demon.net> To: "Mark Davis" <mark.davis@jtcsv.com> Cc: <peter.verthez@alcatel.be>; <tz@lecserver.nci.nih.gov> Sent: Sunday, June 12, 2005 09:14 Subject: Re: Multi-timezone clock
Mark Davis said:
I'm not saying that one should necessarily use all the levels of containment. It depends on other aspects of the UI. The 2nd level of the UN tree is actually reasonably close to the top level TZID arrangement.
UN:
Europe [150] Eastern Europe [151] Northern Europe [154] Southern Europe [039] Western Europe [155]
I note that you are just copying the UN data, but that split into North, South, East, and West Europe bears almost no relation to anything that anyone uses in reality.
-- Clive D.W. Feather | Work: <clive@demon.net> | Tel: +44 20 8495 6138 Internet Expert | Home: <clive@davros.org> | Fax: +44 870 051 9937 Demon Internet | WWW: http://www.davros.org | Mobile: +44 7973 377646 Thus plc | |