April 18, 2013
4:03 a.m.
On Wed, Apr 17, 2013, at 13:58, Tobias Conradi wrote:
Did anyone claim anything to the opposite? If so, could you post the link to that message in the email archive?
Er. Your whole line of argument with this LHHT thing has been that any random fact (e.g. D always means 1:00 and not 0:30) that happens to be true of the data today is a standard that must be adhered to.