Re: [tz] USG_COMPAT and POSIX and XOPEN macros

On 11/23/19 12:33 AM, Andras Farkas wrote:

But using _XOPEN_SOURCE instead.

This code is part of the implementation, not part of the application, so it shouldn't be fooling with feature-test macros. But I take your point that the code should more carefully distinguish the features it supports from the features the underlying C library supports. So I installed the attached proposed patch to try to make this clearer and to support your use case.