Sept. 29, 2014
2:32 p.m.
Sorry to be a pain, but your proposed fix at https://github.com/eggert/tz/commit/2e78bf08dce685478da73888d90fe2fb2fbfc6cd still doesn't quite read right to me. I think it's important, at least for -c, to clarify exactly what is meant by "inclusive" and "exclusive". Proposed further patch attached. Tim Parenti On 11 Sep 2014 03:17, Paul Eggert wrote:
Tim Parenti wrote:
Unfortunately, it seems your example doesn't match observed behavior.
Right you are. Thanks for catching that. Since it doesn't really matter I'd rather leave the code alone, and fix the documentation to describe it, as that'd be less disruptive (and also easier to implement :-). Problem fixed in the first proposed patch attached.