May 24, 2022
8:53 a.m.
Yep, that was the problem. Thanks! On Mon, 23 May 2022 at 19:14, Paul Eggert <eggert@cs.ucla.edu> wrote:
On 5/23/22 04:48, Almaz Mingaleev wrote:
I think overflow happens somewhere. Please see the attached code.
That test doesn't look right, as each mktime call modifies its argument, polluting the next test case. Please try the attached test instead, ported to C. On my platform (Ubuntu 22.04, x86-64) this outputs:
sizeof time_t: 8 2120284800 2120256000 4076812800 <(407)%20681-2800> 4076784000 <(407)%20678-4000>
which looks OK.