Re: Looking for non-TZ-dependent localtime()

Paul Eggert wrote:

GNU/Linux (i.e., glibc) and tzcode are both reasonable.

Thanks for the info. The tzcode code is a lot cleaner and easier to modify the way I want. All other things being equal (or at least similar) that's the way to go. Jonathan Lennox wrote:

I've attached my message implementing it below. It's based on tzcode2001c. It might be a bit of work to update it to the current version of tzcode;

Thanks! This looks like exactly what I need. Your mods (adding an "opaque" struct to represent a parsed tz entry) is what I would have done. pcg@goof.com ( Marc) (A.) (Lehmann ) wrote:

localtime is rarely a bottleneck (it might be for your application), so this shouldn't be a problem.

Thanks for the suggestion, but unfortunately, it is a bottleneck in this application. -- Michael Lindner