The proposal EEFT keeps the EE of EET and EEST. It is also more in line with existing naming rules in the Theory file, quoting Theory: ------- For summer time append `ST'; for double summer time append `DST'; etc. ------- I propose to add "FT" to Theory and insert the following before "For zones whose times are taken from a city's longitude..." -------- All abbreviations end in "T". Some common endings are - MT for mean time (e.g. GTM), - ST for summer time (e.g. CEST), - DST for double summer time - FT for forward time (permanent summer time, e.g. EEFT). -------- I see no rule in Theory supporting an alphabetic order naming as justification for FET, as was done in the proposal for FET (quote: /"FET", simply because "F" comes after E/ ) Therefore, apart from sharing the EE with EEST and EET, EEFT seems more rule based. -- Tobias Conradi Rheinsberger Str. 18 10115 Berlin Germany http://tobiasconradi.com/