July 1, 2011
12:34 p.m.
Robert Elz said:
Now notice the notable lack of any reference to any table of leap seconds in the calculations above. So, we have something that looks like TAI. Except the TAI time would be 14 (?) seconds different than this,
34
This is a bizarre definition of time from any physics, or astronomy sense,
Actually, it's not dissimilar to UT1. -- Clive D.W. Feather | If you lie to the compiler, Email: clive@davros.org | it will get its revenge. Web: http://www.davros.org | - Henry Spencer Mobile: +44 7973 377646