I have a reply to David Patte's message typed, but I have decided to wait a bit before sending it. But these two are easy... Date: Tue, 6 Jul 2010 03:58:42 -0500 From: Bill Seymour <stdbill.h@pobox.com> Message-ID: <AANLkTil04xyA_bV9jJ4T-BfNF8bJQDtADVUICKa0Wb0D@mail.gmail.com> | There's no way to recover the standard offset from UTC That is mostly as the concept isn't real - there is really no "standard" offset from UTC, we'd like it if there were, and we often like to pretend it exists, and in some locales, it is even reasonable to say it does, but when legislatures like to arbitrarily shift their "standard" from one value to another, it starts to become fairly meaningless to settle on anything as really being a standard - all we really have (or need) is the offset from UTC that applies in some area at a particular (universal) time. Expecting more than than is asking for more than the world really gives us. | - Multi-byte integers are aligned on arbitrary byte boundaries. This is just nuisance - if it bothers you, write a converter, and convert the binary file into something easier for your application to parse. It is difficult (or worse...) to change for existing applications, which expect the current format, but trivial to overcome for new ones (so if you have an application that is using the data at a rate that makes this kind of issue significant, which isn't your typical application's use of the data, then avoiding this problem is a 10-20 minute conversion prog from the current data format to whatever suits you best.) Yves Goergen <nospam.list@unclassified.de> said: | zic deals exactly nothing for me right now. Is there a Windows binary | available somewhere? I think you asked that before (perhaps indirectly) and no-one answered, which is a surprise to me, as I cannot imagine anything about zic that would make it particularly difficult to port to anything with a C compiler. And I know that includes windows - though I'm not a windows user and cannot help personally. Sure, some of the frills may need to be trimmed away, but they're not important for the primary task. You said that you tried to build one, and there were unix libc() function calls that were undefined - what were they? Perhaps we can either just give you copies of those functions to use, or tell you they're unnecessary, and you can just delete the references to them. or at worse, tell you what the function needs to do (if it is an OS interface function) and you can write whatever it takes on windows to achieve the same effect. kre