On Wed, 22 Sept 2021 at 03:54, Eliot Lear via tz <tz@iana.org> wrote:
I'm not saying there isn't room for improvement in this process, but it is far better to work the issue respectfully and patiently, recognizing that there are divergent views and needs.
I and others have spent months trying to get this reverted. There hasn't been the slightest indication that Paul comprehends why his actions are unacceptable and nonsensical. There has been absolutely no willingness to revert despite repeated requests from numerous people/groups. You ask for work on the issue to be respectfully and patiently conducted, but that isn't something I can do with 2021b pending. It is just like a loaded gun being pointed at my head. As others have said, the right course of action is to revert to 2021a and draw up proper proposals for the future. I am absolutely certain that a solution can be found. Stephen