Dec. 21, 2012
10:53 a.m.
On Fri, 21 Dec 2012, Robert Elz wrote:
| if, what i've read is right, please note, delhi would be more apt because | it fits the bill better than either mumbai or kolkata;
| 1. delhi is more populous than kolkata.
This one is the one argument for possibly changing - the question is whether the disruption os worth it.
change for the better even if disruptive is welcome... :)
| 3. delhi has no name change problems like mumbai, kolkata, chennai, etc.
Since they aren't likely to change again (I'd guess) this doesn't matter any more.
don't count on it... :) anything is possible out here. ~mayuresh