Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2005 11:41:43 -0500 From: "Olson, Arthur David \(NIH/NCI\) [E]" <olsona@dc37a.nci.nih.gov> Message-ID: <B410D30A78C6404C9DABEA31B54A2813066535@nihcesmlbx10.nih.gov> | I've changed the time zone mailing list server so that when it sends out | messages, replies are directed to tz@elsie.nci.nih.gov. | With providence, this will reduce the number of messages misdirected to | tz@lecserver.nci.nih.gov. Doing that in a Resent-Reply-To header isn't going to help anyone - that's a meaningless header, nothing is going to pay any attention at all to it (The whole set of Resent-* headers are a bit of a black art, but at least the rest of them have some purpose, Resent-Reply-To has none at all). You could use Reply-To (though that has other side effects - though they may be desirable - I don't think we need to start the "Is Reply-To: the-list a good thing?" debate here). Better would just be to have the To or Cc headers have the correct string in them - aside from messages replying to messages that already have the lecserver address, how is that string getting there? That is, as I send this message, there's no mention of lecserver in in the headers, anywhere - there should continue to be none in the To/cc headers when the message gets distributed. If that isn't working, can it get fixed? kre