Nov. 28, 2022
7:47 p.m.
On 2022-11-28 05:40, Philip Newton wrote:
"have has" is a bit ugly....
Yes, I originally used the name "HAVE___HAS_C_ATTRIBUTE", since it tests whether __has_c_attribute exists and that's the naming convention, but I changed it to HAVE_HAS_C_ATTRIBUTE as I worried that the three adjacent underscores would be confusing. If people prefer HAVE___HAS_C_ATTRIBUTE we can easily change to that. The longer name would be more consistent.