Jan. 19, 2007
8:34 a.m.
Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2007 22:48:04 -0600 From: Jesper Norgaard Welen <jnorgard@prodigy.net.mx> Message-ID: <!~!UENERkVCMDkAAQACAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAABgAAAAAAAAADuUZBf7Jo0OrktsA6harmMKAAAAQAAAAUd9MbYQzk02NDykxxjciMwEAAAAA@prodigy.net.mx> | Why "CST" is not defined above | when CST6CDT *is* is beyond me, by the way - compare to EST and EST5EDT. Notice... | # We limit the list to names that have appeared in previous versions of | # this time zone package. which explains that. Why CST never existed as a separate zone in the past when the others did is a different question, which now is really no longer important - it is just a fact with which we need to deal. kre