Re: [tz] Pakistan DST in 2002

Tim Parenti wrote:

Agreed. I took a look through and there thankfully weren't too many cases like this. In the attached patch 0001, I left the few cases where 00:01 is almost definitely correct, like the StJohns and Moncton rules; but removed the others. Feel free to apply it, or not, if people have strong feelings either way.

Let's leave those alone unless we get better data. The ":01"s are from Shanks, which although unreliable is better than nothing. Plausibly legislation specified 00:01 to avoid confusion about midnight transitions.

The attached patch 0002 just rearranges NEWS items a bit, to be more consistent with future / past-and-future / past.

Thanks, I installed that into the experimental version.