Dec. 1, 2014
11:53 p.m.
On Dec 1, 2014, at 5:04 PM, Matt Johnson <mj1856@hotmail.com<mailto:mj1856@hotmail.com>> wrote: ... I like the article though. Interesting bit at the bottom: "Lawmakers rejected the bill, citing programming costs to the state Department of Revenue to make the change permanent." Anyone have a link to explain that bit of trivia? Simple. They made it up, just like politicians always do when they don’t like something but need an excuse that most people will swallow. paul