Re: [tz] Large scale changes proposed in 2014f

Lester Caine wrote:

We NEED an historically correct set of data which I had thought that was now accepted, but it seems not?

We've talked in the past about adding hooks for extra pre-1970 data, presumably mainly for astrological applications. As long as they don't significantly get in the way of the main database (whose scope is areas that have agreed since 1970), I don't think people would have a problem with that. It would be a nontrivial task, though.