[[--Translated text (en -> es)--]] Asunto: Re: FW: Actualización sobre las Negociaciones RAA desde Praga De: carlton.samuels@gmail.com Hola Holly: Por supuesto, los problemas de privacidad que usted destacó atraen a un animado debate y las respuestas muy emocionales. El ALAC ha replanteado su posición y, al al menos durante los últimos 3 años, esa posición se ha reiterado: el reconocimiento de que en cumplimiento de los derechos de libertad de expresión, algunos grupos, especialmente los que podrían ser políticamente inconveniente, de hecho merecen algún tipo de protección, un abrazo comunidad formal de servicios de privacidad definidas y sus proveedores, las condiciones en que un proveedor de la privacidad sería autorizado. Best, - Carlton ============================== Carlton Samuels A Móvil: 876-818-1799 * Estrategia, Planificación, Gobierno, Evaluación y Turnaround * ============================= En Sun, Sep 9, 2012 a las 8:47 pm, acebo Raiche <h.raiche@internode.on.net> escribió:

Hi Carlton

Privacy was one of the really hard issues that the Whois Review had to grapple with. If you look at the initial report (as opposed to the Final and Final Final reports) two privacy issues are there. The first is how to determine registrant eligibility for the privacy server. Should it be confined to individuals, or include organisations (clear candidates would be human rights groups in many countries, womens' refuges etc) Trying to define eligibility will be a challenge. The other challenge is to define who has legitimate access to the contact information held by the privacy server. 'Law enforcement agencies' was the initial thought. But in some countries, private organisations also perform law enforcement tasks under contract to the agency. They are performing legitimate law enforcement tasks but aren't themselves, agencies. Should they have access. Even more difficult are the countries where the state itself is the oppressor - and its 'law enforcement' agencies are the very reason for the need for privacy.

I'm sure that is the reason the Final Final report backed away from any details on the proposal - and probably why discussion is being fostered now.

I suspect there will be many varied and divergent views within ALAC - all of them legitimate. Providing input on what is a complex, vexed issue will be a challenge for GAC - and for ALAC.

Holly

On 08/09/2012, at 12:46 AM, Carlton Samuels wrote:

...

FYI. Note the specific request for advice via GAC on data protection. - Carlton

============================== Carlton A Samuels Mobile: 876-818-1799 *Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround* =============================

---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Kurt Pritz <kurt.pritz@icann.org> Date: Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 11:26 PM Subject: [soac-discussion] FW: Update on the RAA Negotiations Since Prague To: "soac-discussion@icann.org" <soac-discussion@icann.org> Cc: Matt Serlin <matt.serlin@markmonitor.com>

Dear SO/AC Chairs,

****

Recognizing the broad interest in the ICANN community on the RAA negotiations, we wanted to provide you with a brief update on the work conducted since the Prague Meeting for you to share with your members.

****

Since Prague, the negotiation teams have reviewed the input received from the Community in order to identify possible path forwards on the complex issues that have been put on the table in these negotiations. Several meetings have taken place and are scheduled prior to Toronto, including plans to invite the GAC to provide input from data protection experts on several specific issues. There is also an agreement among the negotiation teams to begin analysis of a potential framework for a privacy/proxy accreditation program to be explored with the broader ICANN community.

****

For more information on these important negotiations, please visit the ICANN wiki at:

https://community.icann.org/display/RAA/Negotiations+Between+ICANN+and+Regis...

...

****

Sincerely,

****

Kurt Pritz (ICANN) and Matt Serlin (MarkMonitor)

****

****

****

****

****

****

** ** <smime.p7s>_______________________________________________ At-Large mailing list At-Large@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large

At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org

[[--Original text (en) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/5c8fc6bec4.html --]]