[[--Translated text (en -> es)--]] Asunto: Re: =? UTF-8? Q? RES = 3A_Consulta_a_la_Regi 3A__Fw = B3 = C3 =? UTF-8? == Q? N_-_Elecciones_ALAC_? = De: carlosaguirre62@hotmail.com Jacqueline: totalmente de acuerdo. Sus palabras han mejorado mis palabras. gracias! Carlos Dionisio Aguirre NCA Consejo de la GNSO - ICANN el ex miembro de ALAC por LACRALO Abogado - Especialista en Derecho de los Negocios Sarmiento 71 - 4to. 18 Córdoba - Argentina - * 54-351-424-2123 / 423-5423 http://ar.ageiadensi.org

Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 08:44:29 -0400 From: jam@jacquelinemorris.com To: lac-discuss-en@atlarge-lists.icann.org Subject: Re: [lac-discuss-en] =? Utf-8? Q? RES = 3A_Consulta_a_la_Regi 3A__Fw = B3 = C3 =? UTF-8 ==? Q? N_-_Elecciones_ALAC_!? =

Wow.. "That Is Important to continue our work to advice ICANN, as end users of LAC region. But I think is not the Most Important, Important is so like Have a crew of lawyers in the region who can solve the differents Interpretations presented."

The ONLY reason LACRALO exists is to be the voice of end users in the region in the ICANN multistakeholder model. How can that POSSIBLY NOT be the MOST important thing? And, no, as a non-lawyer (engineer and academic), I don't think it's important at all to have "a crew of lawyers" in the region. I think it's important to have a crew of volunteers who bring the issues and concerns of the local users to ICANN processes and who take the ICANN policy out and explain it to get proper informed feedback from the end users of the region.

That's what LACRALO was created for. That's what I, and most other people joined for.

Jacqueline A. Morris Technology should be like oxygen: Ubiquitous, Necessary, Invisible and Free. (after Chris Lehmann )

2012/8/15 <carlosaguirre62@hotmail.com>:

...

[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]]

Subject: Re: =? Utf-8? Q? RES = 3A_Consulta_a_la_Regi 3A__Fw = B3 = C3 =? UTF-8 ==? Q? N_-_Elecciones_ALAC_!? = From: carlosaguirre62@hotmail.com

Vanda:

I agree with you When you say That Is Important to continue our work to advice ICANN, as end users of LAC region.

But I think is not the Most Important, Important is so like Have a crew of lawyers in the region who can solve the differents Interpretations presented.

For That reason I claim an urgent call to the GA members create a body of interpretation of Framework WG to start the analysis of our Operating Principles to Avoid new Differences of interpretation.

On the other side I strongly disagree (respectfully) with you in "I put the question to the Legal Staff and When They can only gain a response from Them I can analyze and review," Because if we are Trying to solve a situation of Independence or not, you can not ask advice to people out of the region.

We are who to Must Solve this situation, is our situation, our OP That We are made in the past, who we are must-interpret, what we said we did when to.

Nobody can interpret more than us what we wanted to say On That Opportunity.

And finally I agree with you When you said "I` m not lawyer "is evident caps, For That is so Important to have (again) a crew of Lawyers in our region. independent of ICANN legal staff. my two cents, With The maximum Respect to you and your huge experience.

Carlos Dionisio Aguirre NCA GNSO Council - ICANN ALAC former member by LACRALO Lawyer - Specialist in Business Law Sarmiento 71 - 4th. 18 Cordoba - Argentina - * 54-351-424-2123 / 423-5423 http://ar.ageiadensi.org

_______________________________________________ lac-discuss-en mailing list lac-discuss-en@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-en

[[--Original text (en) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/2092f31f9f.html --]]