[[--Translated text (en -> es)--]] Asunto: Re: ¿Podría CISPA Sé el siguiente SOPA? De: carlton.samuels@gmail.com Hola Raquel: Usted coloca una perspectivas interesantes en el debate, gracias por eso. Aparte de eso, parece que pueden haber interpretado mi respuesta como una aprobación de CISPA / SOPA y / o regímenes como el. Para mí, para opinar que lo que la ley tiene la intención CISPA ya se está haciendo no es así y no se pueden tomar como un respaldo. Por lo que vale, mi posición en estos asuntos es reflejo libertario. Pero, dispuestos a aceptar mejoras modestas en la razón y de la política pública amplia efecto. Mejor, - Carlton ============================== Carlton Samuels A Móvil: 876-818-1799 * Estrategia, Planificación, Gobierno, Evaluación y plazos * ============================= El mar, 10 de abril 2012 a las 7:08 PM, Raquel Gatto <raquel.gatto@gmail.com> escribió:
Hi Carlton,
I agree that we should have a coherent argument, in public or private regimes, for what we want to keep in privacy ranges/records.
But having it codified the wrong way (which in my opinion is exactly the problem of SOPA/CISPA and others) is what will weak the users voice to protect their personal data and privacy.
We are talking about two different regimes: (i) one is public regime which is due to government. they have limits to act, especially to keep the accountability to the legitimate sovereigns - the citizens. Of course we are not in the perfect world and sometimes it is not the way things work. But it doesn`t mean it shouldn`t and we shouldn`t keep an eye on it, even if it is to be against taking my/our privacy in name of cyber intelligence management ;) and (ii) we have the other regime which is a private one. It is limited by some consumer and privacy regulation that change from place to place, but in the end we are talking about a choice from a client. So they have the market bounding and electing their choices to keep them on the right track.
My 2 cents...
[]s Raquel
2012/4/10 Carlton Samuels <carlton.samuels@gmail.com>
Thanks, Juan Manuel for sharing. In my view, this essentially only codifies and bring out to the open what has been standard practice forever.
The fact is most technologies begin with an intensely security/military focus and then seeps into the commercial world. It has always seem odd to me that most of us tend to accept that Microsoft and Google can do it but, somehow, not the government. At least not without our prior knowledge. Especially when government [collectively] is possibly the single largest buyer of ICTs.
- Carlton
============================== Carlton A Samuels Mobile: 876-818-1799 *Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround*
=============================
On Sun, Apr 8, 2012 at 3:05 PM, Juan Manuel <jumaropi@yahoo.com> wrote:
I only want to share you this article
Could CISPA Be the Next SOPA? MASHABLE! | 8 DE ABRIL DE 2555 BE http://pulse.me/s/7X00y
A bill introduced to the House of Representatives late last year could become the centerpiece of the next SOPA-style struggle between the tech commun... Read more
-- Sent via Pulse
Sent from my iPhone
_______________________________________________ lac-discuss-en mailing list lac-discuss-en@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-en
_______________________________________________ lac-discuss-en mailing list lac-discuss-en@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-en
[[--Original text (en) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/86dd11d6d7.html --]]