Colegas, transmito aquí una discusión que tiene lugar en el ALAC y que ya ha sido sometida a la atención de LACRALO en otra ocasión. Creo que debemos adelantar en ella, con apoyo informativo y organizativo de nuestros representantes que por lo pronto siguen en sus cargos, y sin esperar un nuevo ultimátum (estructural) para elaborar ideas y expresarnos. En el caso de .health, mencionado aquí por Roberto Gaetano, puede ser útil recuperar las discusiones que se dieron sobre este gTLD cuando fue propuesto por la Organización Mundial de la Saludo (OMS / WHO) en una ronda anterior, la de 2000 si no me equivoco. Estoy a sus órdenes para recuperar los elementos de que dispongo. Saludos Alejandro Pisanty - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dr. Alejandro Pisanty Facultad de Química UNAM Av. Universidad 3000, 04510 Mexico DF Mexico +52-1-5541444475 FROM ABROAD +525541444475 DESDE MÉXICO SMS +525541444475 Blog: http://pisanty.blogspot.com LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty Unete al grupo UNAM en LinkedIn, http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A106C0C8614 Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty ---->> Unete a ISOC Mexico, http://www.isoc.org . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ________________________________________ Desde: at-large-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org [at-large-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org] en nombre de Roberto Gaetano [roberto_gaetano@hotmail.com] Enviado el: martes, 19 de febrero de 2013 12:06 Hasta: 'At-Large Worldwide' CC: 'Discussion for At-Large Europe' Asunto: [At-Large] R: outcomes from the gTLD Review Group re: drafting of possible objections to new gTLD applications Thanks, Dev, for the good work. I believe that the issue of .health is important, and would like to see more discussion in the mailing lists and more opinions to be voiced by At Large participants before a decision is taken by ALAC. As I have posted already in an earlier message, the big concern that I have is the potential consumer confusion in a critical domain like public health. However, this is just the tip of the iceberg. There is a wide debate going on about the "closed generic" TLD class, with a request for comments issued by ICANN (http://www.icann.org/en/news/public-comment/closed-generic-05feb13-en.htm) closing on 7 March. Michele Neylon, to name just one person well known to us, has been already active in pointing out the issue. Personally, I believe that the "closed generic" subject is very important, and deserves an ALAC policy position. I believe that the same care that brand owners exert about the protection of their brands as TLDs has to be exerted by the public interest in protecting the value of generic terms. In the same way that brands want to avoid consumer confusion generated by misuse of brand names, the public interest represented by ALAC should fight to avoid consumer confusion generated by misuse by private business of public resources like generic names. The .health issue is just one case where this is more obvious, and the danger of misuse is higher because the consequences of the consumer confusion will be wider. Regards, Roberto
-----Messaggio originale----- Da: at-large-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org [mailto:at-large- bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org] Per conto di Dev Anand Teelucksingh Inviato: sabato 16 febbraio 2013 22:31 A: afri-discuss@atlarge-lists.icann.org; apac-discuss@atlarge-lists.icann.org; euro-discuss@atlarge-lists.icann.org; lac-discuss-en@atlarge-lists.icann.org; na-discuss@atlarge-lists.icann.org; at-large@atlarge-lists.icann.org Cc: gTLD WG Oggetto: [At-Large] outcomes from the gTLD Review Group re: drafting of possible objections to new gTLD applications
Members of the new gTLD Review Group (gTLD RG) considered the comments from the At-Large community as of February 8 2013 regarding the applications for
.amazon (https://community.icann.org/x/dAFlAg), .patagonia (https://community.icann.org/x/fgFlAg) .health (https://community.icann.org/x/0wZlAg) .nyc (https://community.icann.org/x/CYJEAg)
None of the applications raised any limited public interest concerns (https://community.icann.org/x/QAkQAg)
gTLD RG members ranked each factor of the four tests for community objection grounds ((https://community.icann.org/x/QgkQAg) based on the comments and discussions. Based on these rankings, the following are the decisions by the gTLD RG:
Re: .amazon (https://community.icann.org/x/dAFlAg): There will be no drafting of an objection statement on community grounds for the application for .amazon given that the "detriment" test for community objection grounds was not passed.
Re: .patagonia (https://community.icann.org/x/fgFlAg) There will be no drafting of an objection statement on community grounds for the application for .patagonia given that the "targeting" and "detriment" tests for community objection grounds were not passed.
Re: .health (https://community.icann.org/x/0wZlAg) Objection statements on community grounds will be drafted for the applications for .health given that the four tests for community objection grounds were passed. The gTLD RG will attempt to put together the objection statements to the applications for .health in time for RALO review around 22 February 2013.
Re: .nyc There will be no drafting of an objection statement on community grounds for the application for .nyc given the comments received as on February 8 2013 indicated that the initial objection concerns raised were being addressed. A late comment sent to the gTLD RG on 11 February 2013 was treated by the gTLD RG as being submitted too late for consideration.
Kind Regards,
Dev Anand Teelucksingh gTLD RG chair _______________________________________________ At-Large mailing list At-Large@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large
At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org
_______________________________________________ At-Large mailing list At-Large@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org