Nov. 27, 2010
9:35 p.m.
Dear Lacralo members, I agree with Jacqueline, but there are 2 points, which perhaps are being overlooked - Firstly, our preferred candidate was indicated on the 24th in advance of the 25th deadline and well in advance of the second round voting deadline of 28th. While it is understandable that a vote by our representatives would be made prior to these deadlines, it is unfortunate that to present our voice and our preference have been overlooked. Please note I have purposely not used the term vote in this case as the ALSes did not have a vote but rather a opportunity to voice their preference or favored candidates. Secondly, to this point it appears the process has been maligned and prejudiced simply because ALSes have not been reading the literature before them from both candidates. We again implore our colleagues to review the statements made by both candidates https://community.icann.org/display/DirCan/At-Large+Director+Candidate-Community+Forum+-+11.10, including their follow up statements forwarded by our Secretariat. To choose candidates (either through ignorance or laxness) only based on personal contact or language is a poor indicator of our knowledge on this process and only serves to highlight bias. This mindset should be alien to Lacralo, we should seek out and promote the best representation based on our judgment of statements from the candidates and not be trapped by the impressions of their character or other constraints that we perceive to exist. I thank you for your consideration and good judgment, Cintra Sooknanan Trinidad and Tobago Computer Society En Espanol- Estimados miembros de la LACRALO, Estoy de acuerdo con Jacqueline, pero hay dos puntos, que tal vez se pasa por alto - En primer lugar, nuestro candidato preferido se indicó el día 24 antes de la fecha límite de 25 y mucho antes de la fecha límite segunda ronda de votaciones del 28. Si bien es comprensible que un voto por nuestros representantes se realizaría antes de estos plazos, es lamentable que para obtener nuestra voz y nuestra preferencia ha sido pasado por alto. Tenga en cuenta que no he utilizado a propósito de la votación plazo en este caso como el ALSes no tiene voto sino más bien una oportunidad de expresar su preferencia o de los candidatos favorecidos. En segundo lugar, a este punto parece que el proceso ha sido calumniado y prejuicios ALSes simplemente porque no han estado leyendo la literatura antes que ellos de los dos candidatos.Una vez más, ruego a nuestros colegas a que revise las declaraciones formuladas por ambos candidatos https: / community.icann.org / / display / DirCan / At-Large Director candidatos-Foro de la comunidad - 11.10, incluyendo su seguimiento de las declaraciones enviadas por nuestra Secretaría. Para elegir a los candidatos (ya sea por ignorancia o laxitud) sólo se basa en el contacto personal o el lenguaje es un indicador pobre de nuestro conocimiento sobre este proceso y sólo sirve para destacar el sesgo. Esta mentalidad debe ser ajena a LACRALO, debemos buscar y promover la mejor representación sobre la base de nuestro juicio de las declaraciones de los candidatos y no ser atrapado por las impresiones de su carácter o de otras restricciones que percibimos de existir. Le doy las gracias por su consideración y buen juicio, Cintra Sooknanan Trinidad y Tobago Computer Society On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 4:49 PM, Jacqueline Morris <jam@jacquelinemorris.com > wrote: > Actually, there was no proper vote, with credentials sent to ALSes and > so on, was there? If a directed vote was to be done (and Dev said > that there wasn't), then shouldn't there have been a proper vote, and > also the weighted calculation as stated in the LACRLO rules? > Given that the 2nd round of voting goes until the 28th, I think that > any ALS expressing its opinion before then is perfectly within the > timeframe of the election of the candidate for seat 15. How can > expressing an opinion on the 25th, when first round voting went until > the 25th and 2nd round voting goes until the 28th be too late? > Jacqueline A. Morris > Technology should be like oxygen: Ubiquitous, Necessary, Invisible and > Free. (after Chris Lehmann ) > > > > On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 3:56 PM, <sylvia@internautabrasil.org> wrote: > > > > [[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] > > > > > > Subject: =?utf-8?q?RES=Á_tarjeta_de_votaci=C3=B3n = > > From: sylvia@internautabrasil.org > > > > Dear Jaqueline, > > Excuse by to have responded to him before. > > I am totally in agreement with you and you are why day of mail 22 > November© envià um to list soliciing one votación (Doodle) of > everything lacralo so that their representatives voted by mandate. > > As that did not become and until 25 day mayoria of the commentaries were > in favor of Sebastien, I voté by él. > > They were not conjectures! And he is mà s, some ALSs of the Caribbean > that were pronounced in favor of Alan did después of the voting > schedule. > > Greetings > > Sylvia > > _________________________________________________________ > > Sylvia Herlein Leite > > Secretary FLUI - www.fuilatin.org > > LACRALO-ALAC Member > > Latin America & Regional Caribbean AT-Large Organization > > sylvia@internautabrasil.org > > > > > > > > > > -----Mensagem original > > Of: nome of jam@jacquelinemorris.com lac-discuss-is - > bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org [ mailto:lac-discuss-is - > bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org ] command post > > Shipment command post: sixth-feira, 26 of novembro of 2010 12:02 > > It stops: lac-discuss-es@atlarge-lists.icann.org > > Assunto: Re: card of votación > > > > > > [ [ - - Translated text (in - > is)--]] > > > > > > Subject: Re: card of votación > > Of: jam@jacquelinemorris.com > of my spera account Ã, habÃa on equal > levels of the aid stops > both > > Sebastien and Alan - conté 6 for Alan and 7 for Sebastien. > Puedotener faltó some, so that porqué I am suitablewith the order of > Alex a civil employee counts, so that we know the vote true of the ALSes, > and not as soon as a conjecture. > > > > Jacqueline To Morris > > TecnologÃÂa must be like the oxÃÂgeno: Ubicuo, necessary, invisible > and frees. > > (después of Chris Lehmann <http://twitter.com/chrislehmann> ) > > > > > > > > Fri, of nov the 26 of 2010 in 9:52, <joseluis@barzallo.com> escribió: > > > [ [ - - translated text (is - >)--]] of in > > > > subject: Re: > > card of votación > of: joseluis@barzallo.com> > compañeros > > wanted > > >  > like one està leaving to vote, exists a certain mechanism to do > it directly? > since then > después of which a > reacondicionamiento of the received insumos we has to me decides to the aid > to > Sebastien Bachollet. > > Hot Greetings > > Jose Luis > Barzallo > > AEDIT > > www.aedit.org.ec > > Columbus 535 > and 6 of December > Edif. Cristóbal Columbus Of. 602 > Telf: (593 > 2) 2528774/ 2544464 > fax: 593 2 2564530 > email: > joseluis@barzallo.com > Exempt Ecuador > CONFIDENTIAL > > INFORMACIÃ"n: PROHIBE the DIFUSIÃ"n, COMMUNICATIONOr > PUBLICACIÃ"n > > OF THIS INFORMACIÃ"n to THIRD WITHOUTthe EXPRESS AUTORIZACIÃ"n ÉL > INSIDE > WRITING and OF > BARZALLO and LAWYERS OF BARZALLO. THIS > INFORMACIÓN IS DUE TO KEEP WITH > SECURITIES WHEN THE EAST THAT > IS NOT USED. IF YOU ARE NOT the ADRESSEE> OF THIS email, YOU DEBERA TO > ERASE IT and TO GIVE IT to DETRàS tothe TRANSMITTER > a! > > nd PODRA NOT TO READ, > To the Copy Or TO DISTRIBUTE YOUR ANNEXED and > CONTAINED SALARY. CUALQUIEROPINIONEXPRESSED INSIDE >! > > THIS MESSAGE, NOT NOT NECESSARILY CORRESPONDS to ITS AUTHOR and > ToBARZALLO and > BARZALLO. LAWYERS > > > original -----Mensaje > > of: lacquer-to discuss is - bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org > [ > mailto:lac-discuss-is - bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org ] in name of & > gt;sylvia@internautabrasil.org <gt%3Bsylvia@internautabrasil.org> > > sent: Friday, 26 of November of 2010 7:51 > stops: ' Alexander Pisanty ' > > CENTàMETRO CÃÅ BICO: > lac-discuss-es@atlarge-lists.icann.org > subject: [ lacquer-discuss-is] > TRACK OF CATTLES: QUARTER FOR LOSDOCE: cómo à '  > is going to > vote? > > > dear Compañeros: > Segun all the post office > sent to the list of LACRALO by you COM > the commentaries in the > candidates, and by my personal convictions, I have > voted to Sebastien. > immediately >, > Syliva > > _________________________________________________________ > Sylvia > Herlein Leite > secretary FLUI - www.fuilatin.org > Member of > LACRALO-ALAC &! > > gt; Latin©rich Amàand Organización En-Grande Of > original the Regional Caribbean > sylvia@internautabrasil.org > > > >> > of -----Mensagem > of: lacquer-to discuss is - > bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org > [ mailto:lac-discuss-is - > bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org ] commando post > nome of Alexander > > post of commando sent of Pisanty: fifth-feira, 25 of novembro of > 201021:08 > stops: sylvia@internautabrasil.org > centÃÂÂmetro > cúbico: lac-discuss-es@atlarge-lists.icann.org > Assunto: [ > lacquer-discuss-is ] QUARTER FOR the TWELVE: to cómo goes à '  > > vote? > > hello colleagues, and in the individual that is going > to exert inthe of the vote > selección > IN Great: > à '  > > we are not on the last hours to vote? > à '  > qué > conclusions has reached that they are going to vote? > > > > Alexander Pisanty > > >. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .! > > . . . . . . . . > Dr Alexander Pisanty> UNAM, Av Univer! > > sity. 30 > > 00, 04510 xico©MàDF xico©Mà> > Tels. > +52-(1)-55-5105-6044, +52-(1)-55-5418-3732 > > *my blog of blog/My: > http://pisanty.blogspot.com > * you promarry of LinkedIn towards > outside: http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty > * Twitter: http://twitte > > r.com/apisanty > * Unete to group UNAM in LinkedIn, > > http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/ÃÃ<http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/%C3%83%C6%92%C3%82%C6%92%C3%83>† > '<http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/%C3%83> > ' 106C0C8614 > > > * sees ISOC xico©MÃÂ, http://www.isoc.org.mx, ISOC > http://www.isoc.org > * participates in ICANN, http://www.icann.org... > . . . . . . . . . >. . . . . . . . . . . . . . > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > > [ [ > - - original text (it is) > http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/7Ã<http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/7%C3%83>£bed77dd.html > > --]] > > > > > _______________________________________________ > list that envÃÂÂa > lacquer-to discuss-the! > > c-discuss-in > lac-discuss-en@atlarge-lists.icann.org > > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-in > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > > > > > > > [ [ - - Original text (in) > > http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/27df97be42.html > > --]] > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > > > > > > > [[--Original text (es) > > http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/6a07c84b10.html > > --]] > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > lac-discuss-en mailing list > > lac-discuss-en@atlarge-lists.icann.org > > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-en > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > lac-discuss-en mailing list > lac-discuss-en@atlarge-lists.icann.org > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-en >