[[-- Translated text (en -> es) --]] Maniobras sofisticadas y mordiscos en los bordes, pero en última instancia sigue siendo un patio de recreo del hombre rico. Saludos Lanza Hinds Vicepresidente El miércoles 24 de enero de 2024 a las 17:08 Carlton Samuels<carlton.samuels@gmail.com> escribió:
Have a look at his last paragraph.
Hmm. When is "close enough" to that exclusivity objective good enough, I wonder?
Price restrictions and market manipulation are generally not subject to oversight. So maybe AA is onto something here.
Making price a barrier to access could pass every test and come out on the other side smelling like a rose.
Carlton
============================== *Carlton A Samuels*
*Mobile: 876-818-1799Strategy, Process, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround* =============================
[image: Site logo image] Andrew Allemann posted: "Applicants will not be able to use generic terms exclusively. ICANN's Board of Directors has confirmed that it will not allow so-called "closed generics" in the next round of top level domain name expansion. Closed generics are generic/dictionar" Domain Name Wire | Domain Name News <https://domainnamewire.com> Read on blog <https://domainnamewire.com/2024/01/23/icann-board-nixes-closed-generics-in-n...> or reader <https://public-api.wordpress.com/bar/?stat=groovemails-events&bin=wpcom_emai...> ICANN board nixes “closed generics” in next new round of TLDs <https://public-api.wordpress.com/bar/?stat=groovemails-events&bin=wpcom_emai...>
Andrew Allemann
Jan 23
*Applicants will not be able to use generic terms exclusively.*
[image: The words "closed generics" with a circle and slash indicating they are banned]
ICANN's Board of Directors has confirmed that it will not allow so-called "closed generics" in the next round of top level domain name expansion.
Closed generics are generic/dictionary terms that one company wants to own but not offer to the general public. Think Google getting .search and only using it for its own purposes, or Amazon exclusively using .book.
These types of TLDs weren't initially forbidden in the 2012 expansion round but were retroactively banned after applications were received.
In a January 22 letter, Tripti Sinha, Chair of the ICANN's Board of Directors, confirmed <http://domainnamewire.com?action=user_content_redirect&uuid=b22fd54a9601f6ea...> (pdf) that the board is squashing closed generics in the next round, too.
There was a bit of a loophole in the original ban: companies could continue with their applications as open domains but never launch them. That's the case (so far) with .search and .book, which are still sitting on the shelf. The companies can't exclusively use them but can keep them out of the hands of others.
If they want to use them exclusively, they could also launch them with very high registration prices to keep other users at bay. I wonder if some current owners of unlaunched generic TLDs were hoping for a retroactive reprieve in the upcoming round. Now that that's off the table, they might launch their domains with high prices.
Domain Incite has done an excellent job chronicling <http://domainnamewire.com?action=user_content_redirect&uuid=18b35ba87f17b77e...> the closed generics fight. Comment <https://public-api.wordpress.com/bar/?stat=groovemails-events&bin=wpcom_emai...>
Domain Name Wire | Domain Name News © 2024. Manage <https://public-api.wordpress.com/bar/?stat=groovemails-events&bin=wpcom_emai...> your email settings or unsubscribe.
_______________________________________________ lac-discuss-en mailing list lac-discuss-en@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-en
_______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
-- Lanza Hinds Jefe de Tecnología Grupo BrainStreet 287 'C' Albert St. GeorgetownGuyana Este mensaje contiene información que puede ser privilegiada y/o confidencial y es propiedad de BrainStreet Technologies o BrainStreet Aprendiendo. La información contenida en este documento está destinada únicamente al persona física o jurídica a quien va dirigido y otras personas autorizadas para recíbelo . Si no es el destinatario previsto, no está autorizado leer, imprimir, conservar, copiar, difundir, distribuir o realizar cualquier acción en función del contenido de esta información o cualquier parte de la misma y puede ser ilegal hacerlo. Si recibe este mensaje por error, por favor notificar al remitente inmediatamente y eliminar todas las copias de este mensaje de tu sistema. BrainStreet Technologies o BrainStreet Learning no son responsable de la correcta y completa transmisión de la información contenida en esta comunicación ni ningún retraso en su recepción.