[[--Translated text (en -> es)--]] Asunto: Re: ..... Para un solo Internet a permanecer, dice Fadi De: carlton.samuels@gmail.com Sí, Christopher, visto que también. Pero me temo que si me voy por la señora Viviane Reding de [la Comunidad Europea de Justicia, Derechos Fundamentales y Ciudadanía] modelo de implementación para que la perspectiva política, tiende a reserva compromiso sólo por lo que yo llamo una grupa del G20 + algunos de los BRICs tirado en una causa política evidente. Eso sí, a mí me da la génesis de las opiniones eurocéntricas que expresa; ver su reciente réplica en perspectiva de la política de inmigración de David Cameron como otro ejemplo. Pero su postura relegaría aquellos de nosotros en el borde del imperio, los pequeños Estados del Caribe, el Pacífico y casi toda América América ahorrar y con excepción de Brasil, como meros espectadores para otros que decidir nuestro futuro de Internet. Una vez más, fuera de los límites. Dicha noción debe ser resistido por causa justificada. -Carlton ============================== Carlton Un Samuels Móvil: 876-818-1799 * Estrategia, Planificación, Gobierno, Evaluación y Turnaround * ============================= El Domingo, 12 de enero 2014 a las 8:45 AM, Christopher Wilkinson < cw@christopherwilkinson.eu> escribió:
Good afternoon:
In this context, one may note the following paragraph, inter alia (pp. 52), from the recent European Parliament LIBE committee draft report and resolution:
§ 92. Calls on the Commission and the EEAS to take action at the international level, with the UN in particular, and in cooperation with interested partners (such as Brazil), and to implement an EU strategy for democratic governance of the internet in order to prevent undue influence over ICANNs and IANAs activities by any individual entity, company or country by ensuring appropriate representation of all interested parties in these bodies;
N.B. LIBE: European Parliament Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs EEAS: European External Action Service (the EU State Department or Foreign Office).
CW
On 12 Jan 2014, at 12:50, William Drake <wjdrake@gmail.com> wrote:
And yet we have numerous loud voices saying on the 1Net, governance, Best Bits, etc. mailing lists that 1Net and the Sao Paulo meeting are controlled by ICANN and other dark forces committed to preserving the status quo and US domination and so global civil society must rally to resist these oppressors etc etc
Sigh,
Bill
On Jan 12, 2014, at 1:22 AM, Carlton Samuels <carlton.samuels@gmail.com> wrote:
"The world is seeking and growing ever more anxious to see an independent, globally-accountable ICANN where no one government, no one organization, no one individual has oversight or rights higher than the others, Chehade says. I believe this is fundamental to the spirit of the Internet as well. Equal footing for all stakeholders engaged in the management and governance of this global resource.
http://siliconangle.com/blog/2014/01/10/icanns-fadi-chehade-says-we-have-18-...
-Carlton
_______________________________________________ At-Large mailing list At-Large@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large
At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org
_______________________________________________ At-Large mailing list At-Large@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large
At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org
[[--Original text (en) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/a6cc50bbf0.html --]]