- lac-discuss-es - lists.iana.org

Solicitus de comentarios sobre Objeciones al .HEALTH y IDN string ("jianking") (".健康")
by sylvia＠internautabrasil.org March 2, 2013

March 2, 2013

Estimados miembros de LACRALO Ayer participé, junto a representantes de las otras 4 RALOS, de la teleconferencia sobre las 5 objeciones que el grupo de trabajo sobre los NGTLD https://community.icann.org/display/newgtldrg/At-Large+New+gTLD+Review+Grou… , realizó sobre el .HEALTH ( .SALUD) Los otros Ngtld, sobre los cuales nuestra comunidad hizo comentarios (.PATAGONIA; .AMAZON, etc), no pasaron por los requisitos mínimos estipulados por el grupo de trabajo y por eso no recibieron “declaración de objeción” Vean requisitos https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/40928434/patagonia-communi… <https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/40928434/patagonia-communi…> &modificationDate=1360686211000 Es necesaria la aprobación de 3 RALOS para que estas objeciones tengan efecto. Y por tal motivo se ha solicitado que cada RALO emita su parecer. Cada Ralo debe manifestarse por SÍ / NO / ABSTENCIÓN https://community.icann.org/display/newgtldrg/At-Large+Objection+Statements… https://community.icann.org/display/newgtldrg/Advice+from+the+RALOs+to+the+… Tenemos plazo hasta el 5 de marzo a las 23:59 UTC Hemos abierto una WIKI para que puedan hacer comentarios sobre si LACRALO: APOYA, NO APOYA, o SE ABSTIENE a la objeción del . HEALTH y la aplicación para IDN string ("jianking") (".健康") ( aunque también pueden hacerlo respondiendo este e-mail.) https://community.icann.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=40931651 Por cualquier duda o aclaración podemos consultar a los miembros de nuestro RALO que participaron de este grupo de trabajo: Carlton Samuels y Dev Anand Teelucksingh Saludos, Sylvia ___________________________________________________ Sylvia Herlein <mailto:sylvia@internautabrasil.org> sylvia(a)internautabrasil.org Secretaria LACRALO-ICANN/ 2012-2013 - <http://atlarge.icann.org> http://atlarge.icann.org Secretaria FLUI 2009-2012 sylvia_leite=Skype Descrição: Assinatura_Sylvia_Internautabrasil

4 3

Re: Fwd: COMUNICADO VOTO: Declaraci�n de ALAC sobre las "cerradas" Aplicaciones gen�ricos gTLD
by jam＠jacquelinemorris.com March 1, 2013

March 1, 2013

[[--Translated text (en -> es)--]] Asunto: Re: Fwd: COMUNICADO VOTO: Declaración de ALAC sobre las "cerradas" Aplicaciones genéricos gTLD De: jam(a)jacquelinemorris.com Estoy a favor de la declaración de ALAC. Es razonable y equilibrado. Jacqueline A. Morris La tecnología debería ser como el oxígeno: ubicua, necesaria, Invisible y Gratis. (Después de que Chris Lehmann <http://twitter.com/chrislehmann> ) El Viernes, 01 de marzo 2013 a las 12:42 PM, Natalia Enciso <natalia.enciso(a)gmail.com> escribió: > Recibí las credenciales para votar sobre closed generic TLDS.Ayer enví un > mail al respecto. > Favor manifestarse para saber como votar, como región. > Saludos > Natalia > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: ICANN At-Large Staff <staff(a)atlarge.icann.org> > Date: 2013/3/1 > Subject: [ALAC-Announce] VOTE ANNOUNCEMENT: ALAC Statement on the "Closed > Generic" gTLD Applications > To: "alac-announce(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org" < > alac-announce(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org> > > > Dear All, > > Olivier Crépin-Leblond, Chair of the ALAC, has asked that a vote be held by > the ALAC on the proposed ratification of the "ALAC Statement on the "Closed > Generic" gTLD Applications<https://community.icann.org/x/Z4JwAg>." > > ***** > Question: Do you support the ratification of the "ALAC Statement on the "< > https://community.icann.org/x/Z4JwAg><https://community.icann.org/x/Z4JwAg > >Closed > Generic" gTLD Applications<https://community.icann.org/x/Z4JwAg>" for > communication to the relevant parties? > ***** > > Additional information on this final paper can be found on the At-Large > "Closed Generic" gTLD Applications Workspace< > https://community.icann.org/x/Z4JwAg>. > > Please note that the poll will be open from 01-March-2013 16:30 UTC to > 06-March-2013 23:59 UTC. > > Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Matt Ashtiani, Gisella Gruber, Nathalie > Peregrine and Julia Charvolen > ICANN Policy Staff in support of ALAC > E-mail: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org<mailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org> > _______________________________________________ > ALAC-Announce mailing list > ALAC-Announce(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac-announce > > At-Large Official Site: http://www.atlarge.icann.org > > > > -- > natalia.enciso(a)gmail.com > _______________________________________________ > lac-discuss-es mailing list > lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es > > http://www.lacralo.org > [[--Original text (en) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/f26acaee07.html --]]

1 0

Fwd: [ALAC-Announce] VOTE ANNOUNCEMENT: ALAC Statement on the "Closed Generic" gTLD Applications
by Natalia Enciso March 1, 2013

March 1, 2013

Recibí las credenciales para votar sobre closed generic TLDS.Ayer enví un mail al respecto. Favor manifestarse para saber como votar, como región. Saludos Natalia ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: ICANN At-Large Staff <staff(a)atlarge.icann.org> Date: 2013/3/1 Subject: [ALAC-Announce] VOTE ANNOUNCEMENT: ALAC Statement on the "Closed Generic" gTLD Applications To: "alac-announce(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org" < alac-announce(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org> Dear All, Olivier Crépin-Leblond, Chair of the ALAC, has asked that a vote be held by the ALAC on the proposed ratification of the "ALAC Statement on the "Closed Generic" gTLD Applications<https://community.icann.org/x/Z4JwAg>." ***** Question: Do you support the ratification of the "ALAC Statement on the "< https://community.icann.org/x/Z4JwAg><https://community.icann.org/x/Z4JwAg>Closed Generic" gTLD Applications<https://community.icann.org/x/Z4JwAg>" for communication to the relevant parties? ***** Additional information on this final paper can be found on the At-Large "Closed Generic" gTLD Applications Workspace< https://community.icann.org/x/Z4JwAg>. Please note that the poll will be open from 01-March-2013 16:30 UTC to 06-March-2013 23:59 UTC. Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Matt Ashtiani, Gisella Gruber, Nathalie Peregrine and Julia Charvolen ICANN Policy Staff in support of ALAC E-mail: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org<mailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org> _______________________________________________ ALAC-Announce mailing list ALAC-Announce(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac-announce At-Large Official Site: http://www.atlarge.icann.org -- natalia.enciso(a)gmail.com

1 0

Curso nivelatorio para ALSes
by José Francisco Arce March 1, 2013

March 1, 2013

*Estimados,* Esta es la lista de integrantes, aun no definitiva: *Integrantes:* Diego Acosta Bastidas Alejandro Pisanty Humberto Carrasco Sergio Salinas Porto José Arce Juan Manuel Rojas Sylvia H. Leyte Antonio Medina Gómez Me gustaría que vayamos a la wiki (o por email): https://community.icann.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=40930409 Y a partir de allí comentemos respecto de la estructura (Módulos) del cual el curso debería constar. Así mismo creo que deberíamos estipular el tiempo que llevaría hacerlo. Contamos con la ventaja de que mucho material ya está en ambos idiomas, pero solo terminando esta estructura, vamos a poder identificar el que falta. De mi parte he juntado el material que ha elaborado el personal de ICANN y estoy tratando de armar ya el ítem 5 de "recursos para la participación". Siéntanse libres de opinar y proponer cambios. Despues de este email público seguiremos en una lista solo con los integrantes Saludos José Arce.-

4 5

closed generic gTLD
by Natalia Enciso Feb. 28, 2013

Feb. 28, 2013

Buenos días! Les reenvio este correo de la lista de ALAC, que tiene información importante. Abajo encontrarán información sobre: 1.Closed Generic" gTLD En la úlitma llamada de ALAC, Evan presento una declaración sobre este tema, presentando 2 posibilidades: a favor y en contra. Este es el link al statement: https://community.icann.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=40927847 <https://community.icann.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=40927847> Se que Evan esta en esta lista, y le pediría por favor que explique a la región sobre este tema, para que podamos votar con conocimiento cuando llegue el momento. 2. Invitación a una llamada organizada por RySG y NTAG el lunes 4 de Marzo, 1500 UTC. Se discutirá sobre las ultimas modificaciones introducidas al manual del aplicante del new gTLD. (< http://newgtlds.icann.org/en/applicants/agb/base-agreement-specs-summary-ch… > http://newgtlds.icann.org/en/applicants/agb/base-agreement-specs-summary-ch… ). The RySG's full public comments are available here: >(< http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-base-agreement-05feb13/msg00019.html> http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-base-agreement-05feb13/msg00019.html) *Adobe Connect Room* Meeting Information Name: RySG Summary: RySG URL: http://icann.adobeconnect.com/rysg/ Language: English Access: Anyone who has the URL for the meeting may enter the room Saludos, Natalia ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: <alac-request(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org> Date: 2013/2/28 Subject: ALAC Digest, Vol 55, Issue 17 To: alac(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org Send ALAC mailing list submissions to alac(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to alac-request(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org You can reach the person managing the list at alac-owner(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of ALAC digest..." Today's Topics: 1. Re: Closed generic statement (Carlton Samuels) 2. Fwd: [council] RySG Invitation to Community Consultation Teleconference on Monday, March 4 -- Discuss ICANN's Proposed Registry Agreement Changes (Alan Greenberg) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2013 07:50:56 -0500 From: Carlton Samuels <carlton.samuels(a)gmail.com> Subject: Re: [ALAC] Closed generic statement To: Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg(a)mcgill.ca> Cc: ALAC Working List <alac(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org> Message-ID: <CAOZQb9QApaqWu8ALe-9rgYzSgPrTJJnhs8Ps2dHG77eg40KYDg(a)mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 The fundamental cannot be successfully refuted. So let's look at the other claim: the public interest is subverted. The statement itself does a good enough job to undermine that claim and shows up the internal inconsistency of the logic utilised. I am asserting the evidence that supports this declaration that closed generics are inimical to the public interest is well, weak, at best. All we can say for sure is that it tends to subvert the existing business model. And the evidence is right there in the statement! The first paragraph goes "On the whole, the ALAC does not believe that closed generics provide public benefit". Then that is undermined by Paragraph 2: "We can foresee innovative business models that might allow a closed TLD to be in the public interest. An example might be a registry that makes 2nd level names available at no cost to anyone, but retains legal control over them. This is similar to the model used by Facebook and many blog hosting sites." This is the problem with the statement......"We can forseee". "Forsee"! It is projecting - projecting - an outcome with evidence now available, slim as that is that mortally wounds the declaration of the fist paragraph. -Carlton ============================== Carlton A Samuels Mobile: 876-818-1799 *Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround* ============================= On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 1:00 AM, Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg(a)mcgill.ca >wrote: > At Tuesday's ALAC meeting, Evan presented a statement on closed > generic word domains that gave the two opposing positions that had > been expressed by various ALAC and At-Large people. I suggested that > the ALAC not vote for or against that statement, but each member say > with side they supported. As the discussion evolved, there was some > discomfort about simply giving a tally of the two sides, and > moreover, that it ignored a third option that allowed some parts of > both sides to be supported. I volunteered to work with Evan to create > a new version. > > I did create such a 3rd "in between" option. As we were reviewing it, > and partially guided by a message from Roberto Gaetano, Evan > suggested that this in-between option, with some enhancements, could > be a single statement that most or all of the ALAC could support. > > What you see here is an evolution of that statement. Thanks to > Olivier and Rinalia who identified a number of problems with earlier > versions. > > The comment period closes on March 7th, so a vote will need to be > completed by March 6th. I believe that Olivier would like to start a > vote relatively quickly, so if you have any problems with what you > see here, please speak up quickly. > > This new statement is also posted on the wiki - > https://community.icann.org/x/Z4JwAg. > > Alan > > ================================= > > On the whole, the ALAC does not believe that closed generics provide > public benefit and would prefer that TLDs -- especially for strings > representing categories -- were not allocated in a way that would > lock out broad access to sub-domains. Some members of At-Large > believe, on principle, that all closed generics are harmful to the > public good. Others believe that, while not necessarily being > beneficial to end users, closed gTLDs should be allowed as simply > being consistent with existing practise for lower-level domains. > > However, in developing this response to the Board's request, the ALAC > found the issue to be far more nuanced than the above hard positions > would suggest. We can foresee innovative business models that might > allow a closed TLD to be in the public interest. An example might be > a registry that makes 2nd level names available at no cost to anyone, > but retains legal control over them. This is similar to the model > used by Facebook and many blog hosting sites. Allowance should be > made for applicants interested in widespread sub-domain distribution > that do not require domain-name sales as a source of revenue, or for > other forms of sub-domain allocation. > > Whether a generic-word string is used with its generic meaning or in > some other context may also be relevant. The fictitious but famous > computer manufacturer, Orange Computers Inc. using the TLD ".orange" > might be acceptable, while the same string used as a closed TLD by a > California Orange Growers Cooperative (and not allowing access to > orange producers from Florida or Mediterranean and South American > countries) might well be considered unacceptable. > > Allowing this nuanced approach would likely involve a case by case > review of how a TLD will be used and how its sub-domains will be > allocated. Moreover, it would require a contractual commitment to not > change that model once the TLD is delegated. > > In summary, the ALAC believes that completely uncontrolled use of > generic words as TLDs is not something that ICANN should be > supporting. However, some instances of generic word TLDs could be > both reasonable and have very strong benefits of just the sort that > ICANN was seeking when the TLD space was opened. Such uses should not > be excluded. > > > _______________________________________________ > ALAC mailing list > ALAC(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac > > At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org > ALAC Working Wiki: > https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(AL… > ------------------------------ Message: 2 Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2013 08:58:56 -0500 From: Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg(a)mcgill.ca> Subject: [ALAC] Fwd: [council] RySG Invitation to Community Consultation Teleconference on Monday, March 4 -- Discuss ICANN's Proposed Registry Agreement Changes To: ALAC Working List <alac(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org>, At-Large Worldwide <at-large(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org> Message-ID: <d3fc3fb3-6a43-4e46-9a61-8572413a7557(a)EXHUB2010-1.campus.MCGILL.CA> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" >From: "Neuman, Jeff" <Jeff.Neuman(a)neustar.us> >To: "council(a)gnso.icann.org" <council(a)gnso.icann.org> >Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2013 01:39:02 -0500 >Subject: [council] RySG Invitation to Community Consultation >Teleconference on Monday, > March 4 -- Discuss ICANN's Proposed Registry Agreement Changes > >Dear Councilors, > >I wanted to personally invite each of you as well as members from >your SGs and Constituencies to a call being hosted by the RySG and >the NTAG on Monday, March 4th. We look forward to this open >consultation with the community. > > >**** RySG/NTAG Community-Wide Consultation on the New gTLD Agreement >Modifications***** > >The Registries Stakeholder Group (RySG) and its New gTLD Applicant >Group (NTAG) invite your participation in a community-wide >consultation teleconference on Monday, March 4, 2013 at 1500 UTC. > >On 5 February 2013, nearly nine months after new gTLD applicants >spent hundreds of millions of dollars in anticipation of the new >introduction of new gTLDs, ICANN proposed a series of last-minute >material changes to the registry agreement contained in the Final >New gTLD Applicant Guidebook. Included within these changes are a >brand new process for making additional Public Interest Commitments >(PICs), a unilateral right for ICANN to amend the registry >agreement, the requirement to use only registrars that have executed >the yet-to-be-completed 2013 Registrar Accreditation Agreement and a >host of other changes summarized in a 21-page summary of changes >document. >(< http://newgtlds.icann.org/en/applicants/agb/base-agreement-specs-summary-ch… > http://newgtlds.icann.org/en/applicants/agb/base-agreement-specs-summary-ch… ). > > >The RySG believes that the latest proposed version of the Final >Agreement contains so many serious and fundamental flaws that it >should be withdrawn in its entirety and the previously agreed-to >version in the Applicant Guidebook should be used. We oppose certain >proposed amendments, and believe that other provisions need further >thought and refinement. We are equally concerned about the timeline >ICANN has imposed on the community's consideration of these >proposals, and the mechanism by which ICANN proposes to adopt and >implement the changes. > >The issues at stake in the short and long term deserve sufficient >time and consideration to ensure that new gTLDs are offered in a >secure and stable manner and are successful in fostering innovation >via sound business models that support the needs of all stakeholders >in ways that have been developed via the bottom-up, multi-stakeholder process. > >The RySG's full public comments are available here: >(< http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-base-agreement-05feb13/msg00019.html> http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-base-agreement-05feb13/msg00019.html) > >ICANN has posted the proposed changes for public comment which ends >on February 26, 2013, with a reply period that closes on March 20, >2013. In order to facilitate the receipt of public input in this >short amount of time, the RySG will host this open community-wide >consultation to discuss the proposed agreement modifications. The >meeting will be held on Monday, March 4, 2013 at 1500 [UTC]. We >cordially invite applicants, members of the community, the ICANN >Board and the ICANN staff to attend this consultation. > >Please open the attachment to find the Adobe connect link and >teleconference details. > >Best regards, > >Jeffrey J. Neuman >Neustar, Inc. / Vice President, Business Affairs >46000 Center Oak Plaza, Sterling, VA 20166 >Office: +1.571.434.5772 Mobile: +1.202.549.5079 Fax: >+1.703.738.7965 / ><mailto:jeff.neuman@neustar.biz>jeff.neuman(a)neustar.biz / www.neustar.biz

1 0

Re: [lac-discuss-es] Curso Nivelatorio para ALS
by Diego Acosta Feb. 28, 2013

Feb. 28, 2013

Estimada Aida Bienvenida a participar de esta idea constructiva porpuesta por nuestro presidente José Arce, precisamente el dieño del curso pretende como objetico principal " desenredar " este campo lleno de códigos y metalenguajes tecnocráticos complejos de entender para un profano y mucho menos para un recién llegado. Facilitar la comunicación de las ideas fundamentales no solo hará " amigable " el entorno como dicen los desarrolladores de sistemas sino que ayudará a crear lazos màs fuertes sobre la base de un cabal conocimiento. PROCESO DE COMUNICACION DEL GRUPO DE TRABAJO No sé porque esta comunicación de Aida no se encadenó en el hilo de mail que hemos venido trabajando; una cuestión me parece útil y práctica para no desperdiciar el talento de las adhesiones: Tratemos de manejar el tema del grupo de trabajo en un solo hilo de conversación, eso de pronto se lo podría lograr con la utilización exclusiva de la opción responder para que se guarde el asunto único de la conversación que es: " [lac-discuss-es] Curso Nivelatorio para ALS " o de pronto este es otro hilo ? me corrigen por favor si estoy errado. Atte Diego Acosta Bastidas, Dr. DTECH ECUADOR Comunidad Libre ECUADOR Facilitador de la adaptación a Moodle Atte Diego Acosta Bastidas, Dr. Comunidad Libre ECUADOR El 28 de febrero de 2013 08:46, Aida Noblia <aidanoblia(a)gmail.com> escribió: > Estimados; > > Desde una ALS recién llegada, les agradecemos mucho la disposición para > estos cursos nivelatorios y queremos hacerles saber que entendemos que > serán gran utilidad para poder participar en una forma adecuada. > > En nuestra asociación la actividad recién se reinicia luego del verano, > estamos en una actitud atenta asistiendo a las reuniones y viendo los > documentos a que podemos acceder para poder insertarnos de la mejor manera > posible en la organización. > > > Saludos a todos > > -- > Aida Noblia > _______________________________________________ > lac-discuss-es mailing list > lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es > > http://www.lacralo.org >

1 0

Curso Nivelatorio para ALS
by Aida Noblia Feb. 28, 2013

Feb. 28, 2013

Estimados; Desde una ALS recién llegada, les agradecemos mucho la disposición para estos cursos nivelatorios y queremos hacerles saber que entendemos que serán gran utilidad para poder participar en una forma adecuada. En nuestra asociación la actividad recién se reinicia luego del verano, estamos en una actitud atenta asistiendo a las reuniones y viendo los documentos a que podemos acceder para poder insertarnos de la mejor manera posible en la organización. Saludos a todos -- Aida Noblia

1 0

Re: [lac-discuss-es] Curso nivelatorio para ALSes
by carlosaguirre62＠hotmail.com Feb. 27, 2013

Feb. 27, 2013

[[--Translated text (en -> es)--]] Asunto: Re: Curso nivelatorio para ALSes De: carlosaguirre62(a)hotmail.com por favor me jose añadir a la lista. gracias Carlos Dionisio AguirreAbogado - Especialista en Derecho de los Negocios Sarmiento 71 - 4to. 18 Córdoba - Argentina - * 54-351-424-2123 / 423-5423 > Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2013 21:38:29 +0000 > From: josefranciscoarce(a)gmail.com > To: lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > CC: > Subject: [lac-discuss-en] Course nivelatorio for ALSes > > > [[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] > > Subject: Course nivelatorio for ALSes > From: josefranciscoarce(a)gmail.com > > * Estimates, * > > > This is the list of members, while not definitive: > > > * Members: * > > > Diego Acosta Bastidas > > > Alejandro Pisanty > > > Humberto Carrasco > > > Sergio Salinas Porto > > > JosArce > > > Juan Manuel Rojas > > > Sylvia H. Leyte > > > Antonio Medina Gmez > > > I would like to go to the wiki (or email): > https://community.icann.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=40930409 > > > And from allcomentemos regarding the structure (Modules) which > The course should contain. Asmismo think deberamos stipulate the time > to carry it. We have the advantage that much material is already > in both languages, but only finishing this structure, we will be able > identify the missing. > > > For my part I've put together the material that made staff > ICANN and am > trying to put together and the tem 5 of "resources for participation." > > > Free Sintanse review and propose changes. After this email > audience will follow in a list with members only > > > Regards > > > JosArce. - > _______________________________________________ > > > [[--Original text (en) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/0e54e7070b.html --]]

1 0

Solicitud de comentarios: At-Large Educaci�n caducado recuperaci�n necesidades de registro de �rea de
by staff＠atlarge.icann.org Feb. 27, 2013

Feb. 27, 2013

[[--Translated text (en -> es)--]] Asunto: Solicitud de comentarios: At-Large Educación caducado recuperación necesidades de registro de área de De: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org Queridos todos, Por favor, tenga en cuenta que el At-Large Educación caducado recuperación necesidades de registro Espacio de trabajo < https://community.icann.org/x/34twAg> Por favor, envíe sus comentarios sobre el espacio de trabajo utilizando la función de comentarios del 15 de marzo de 2013 a las 23:59 UTC. Saludos, Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Matt Ashtiani, Gruber Gisella, Peregrine Nathalie y Charvolen Julia El personal de ICANN Política en apoyo de ALAC E-mail: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org <mailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org> _______________________________________________ [[--Original text (en) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/7f14fdd49b.html --]]

1 0

CALL FOR COMMENTS: At-Large Expired Registration Recovery Education Needs Workspace
by ICANN At-Large Staff Feb. 27, 2013

Feb. 27, 2013

Dear All, Please note that the At-Large Expired Registration Recovery Education Needs Workspace<https://community.icann.org/x/34twAg> has been created. Please note that this workspace will be used to collected the At-Large's Expired Registration Recovery Education Needs. Please submit any comments on the workspace using the comments function by 15-March-2013 at 23:59 UTC. Regards, Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Matt Ashtiani, Gisella Gruber, Nathalie Peregrine and Julia Charvolen ICANN Policy Staff in support of ALAC E-mail: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org<mailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org>

1 0