- lac-discuss-es - lists.iana.org

Re: [lac-discuss-es] Invitación Reunión / LACRALO llamada mensual - Lunes 15 de septiembre de 2014 se proporcionará interpretación / Portugués.DISCULPAS AUSENCIA
by Cristian Casas Sept. 15, 2014

Sept. 15, 2014

Pido disculpas por no poder asistir pero me encuentro en ese horario rindiendo un parcial en la facultad de derecho de MDP. Solicito informe de dicha reunion, saludo atte. Cristian Casas El 10/09/2014 10:44, <staff(a)atlarge.icann.org> escribió: > > [[--Translated text (en -> es)--]] > > Asunto: Invitación Reunión / LACRALO llamada mensual - Lunes 15 de > septiembre de 2014 se proporcionará interpretación / Portugués > Desde: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org > > Queridos todos, > > > > > > > La siguiente llamada LACRALO mensual está prevista para el lunes 15 de > septiembre de 2014 2300 UTC. > > > > > > > Se proporcionará interpretación en portugués. > > > > > > > Para otros horarios: > > > http://tinyurl.com/q6kpeql > > > > > > > El proyecto de orden del día (para ser actualizado) y detalles de > llamadas están disponibles en: > > > https://community.icann.org/x/WQHxAg > > > > > > > Adobe Connect: > > > http://icann.adobeconnect.com/lacralo > > > > > > > > > > > ID de conferencia: > > > > > > > EN 1638 > > > > > > > ES 1738 > > > > > > > PT 5393 > > > > > > > > > > > Espacio de trabajo Wiki: > > > https://community.icann.org/x/NJQi > > > > > > > > > > > Por favor confirme su línea de salida y el número preferido de: > > > staff(a)atlarge.icann.org <mailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org> > > > > > > > > > > > Gracias. > > > > > > > Saludos, > > > Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Ariel Liang, Gisella Gruber, Nathalie > Peregrine y Terri Agnew > El personal de ICANN Política en apoyo de ALAC > E-mail: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org > <applewebdata://68497759-1B04-4F9B-84B7-B9445B8F305F/Regards,%20Heidi%20Ullrich,%20Silvia%20Vivanco,%20Matt%20Ashtiani,%20Ariel%20Liang,%20Gisella%20Gruber,% > 20Nathalie%20Peregrine%20and%20Julia%20Charvolen%20ICANN%20Policy%20Staff%20in%20support%20of%20ALACmailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org > > > Facebook: www.facebook.com/icann.atlarge < > https://www.facebook.com/icann.atlarge> > Twitter:ICANN_AtLarge < https://twitter.com/ICANN_AtLarge> > > > > > > > > > > > > > lac-discuss-en la lista de correo > > > lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org <mailto: > lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org> > > > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-en > _______________________________________________ > > > > [[--Original text (en) > http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/58a1576b2c.html > --]] > > > > _______________________________________________ > lac-discuss-es mailing list > lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es > > http://www.lacralo.org >

1 0

Asesor Con 37 Aclaraciones para RAA 2013 RDDS (WHOIS) Especificaci�n
by carlton.samuels＠gmail.com Sept. 14, 2014

Sept. 14, 2014

[[--Translated text (en -> es)--]] Asunto: Asesor Con 37 Aclaraciones para RAA 2013 RDDS (WHOIS) Especificación Desde: carlton.samuels(a)gmail.com Aquí están: https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/registry-agreement-spec4-raa-rdds-201… -Carlton ============================== Carlton A Samuels Móvil: 876-818-1799 * Estrategia, Planificación, Gobierno, Evaluación y Turnaround * ============================= _______________________________________________ [[--Original text (en) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/44b641afd8.html --]]

1 0

Rv: [At-Large] Acknowledgment of Second At-Large Summit Declaration
by Juan Manuel Rojas Sept. 12, 2014

Sept. 12, 2014

Para su información. JUAN MANUEL ROJAS Comunicador Social Presidente - AGEIA DENSI Colombia Twitter: @JmanuRojas Unete a LACRALO: https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es El Viernes, 12 de septiembre, 2014 4:00:00, Christian de Larrinaga <cdel(a)firsthand.net> escribió: Congratulations to Olivier and the At Large community! Christian Sébastien Bachollet wrote: > Hello, > Please find the link to the Board resolutions (meting on the 9th of > September 2014) > https://www.icann.org/resources/board-material/resolutions-2014-09-09-en > > > Among other things please have a look to the resolution about ATLAS II and > to the note at the end of the resolution and before the rational. > > https://www.icann.org/resources/board-material/resolutions-2014-09-09-en#3. > e > > > > > 1. Acknowledgment of Second At-Large Summit Declaration > > Whereas, the Second At-Large Summit (ATLAS II) was held at theICANN 50 > meeting in London, United Kingdom in June 2014. > > Whereas, ATLAS II has built on the first summit organized in March 2009 at > the ICANN 34 meeting in Mexico. > > Whereas, the Board has received the Final ATLAS II Declaration > (https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/48338039/ATLAS-II-Declara > tion-with-appendix-RC9.pdf?version=1&modificationDate=1407420726000&api=v2 > [PDF, 204 KB]). > > Whereas, the At-Large community continues the Summit's spirit of > engagement and enthusiasm through a set of post-ATLAS II implementation > activities. > > Resolved (2014.09.09.08), the Board acknowledges the Final ATLAS II > Declaration, and extends its congratulations on the successful Summit held > during ICANN 50 in London. > > Resolved (2014.09.09.09), the Board affirms the significance of the ATLAS > II Summit and its outcomes as valuable input from the At-Large community > of individual Internet users towards strengthening ICANN. > > Resolved (2014.09.09.10), the Board expresses its appreciation for the > tremendous effort made by the At-Large community in delivering the > At-Large Summit, the Final ATLAS > II Declaration and the post-ATLAS II implementation activities. > > Resolved (2014.09.09.11), the Board looks forward to following up with the > ALAC on any inputs that are provided to the Board resulting from the Final > ATLAS II Declaration. > > Note: Three voting members of the Board abstained from voting on the > resolutions. They stated for the record that they were supportive of the > work resulting from the ATLAS, but wanted to draw attention to their > encouragement for the Board to take future consideration of plans to > develop the ATLAS into a regularly occurring event. > > Rationale for Resolutions 2014.09.09.08 2014.09.09.11The Second At-Large > Summit (ATLAS II), which was made possible by the Board approving a > special budget for the event, resulted in the production of the ATLAS II > Declaration. This Declaration was sent to Steve Crocker by Olivier > Crépin-Leblond on 7 August 2014. > This document is the result of the work of approximately 150 At-Large > Structures from 70 countries meeting face to face in London in June 2014. > The Declaration includes the work of all of the 5 ATLAS II Thematic > Working Groups: > > * Thematic Group 1 (TG1): Future of Multi-Stakeholder Models > * Thematic Group 2 (TG2): The Globalization of ICANN > * Thematic Group 3 (TG3): Global Internet: The User Perspective > * Thematic Group 4 (TG4): ICANN Transparency and Accountability > * Thematic Group 5 (TG5): At-Large Community Engagement inICANN > > It contains 43 Recommendations both the ICANN Board, to ICANNand to the > ALAC, referenced as R-1 to R-43. It also contains 10 Observations for the > wider Internet Community, referenced as O-1 to O-10. > The At-Large community is currently beginning work on the implementation > of the Recommendations and Observations through a special Taskforce. > The ALAC is seeking feedback on the Declaration from the widerICANN > community. > This is an Organizational Administrative Function for which public comment > is not required. > > > > > > > Sébastien Bachollet > +33 6 07 66 89 33 > Blog: http://sebastien.bachollet.fr/ > Mail: Sébastien Bachollet <sebastien(a)bachollet.com> > > > > > _______________________________________________ > At-Large mailing list > At-Large(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large > > At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org -- Christian de Larrinaga FBCS, CITP, MCMA ------------------------- @ FirstHand ------------------------- +44 7989 386778 cdel(a)firsthand.net ------------------------- _______________________________________________ At-Large mailing list At-Large(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org

1 0

Participación ICANN 51 Los Angeles
by Alberto Soto Sept. 11, 2014

Sept. 11, 2014

Estimados, vuelvo a recordar esto. Creo que es una excelente oportunidad para quienes no puedan concurrir a Los Ángeles. He visto como para ICANN 50 Londres, AFRALO aprovechó este recurso para que pudieran participar quienes no viajaron. Esto vence mañana, pero si hay alguien que vea alguna posibilidad de hacerlo, me avisa Les pido por favor que vean esto, y nos hagan llegar a Humberto ya a mí, todas las inquietudes que tengan para posibilitar su utilización. Mi sugerencia: debe ser visto por alguien que sea experto en comunicaciones, y que luego les explique todo lo necesario. No es sencillo, pero tampoco imposible Saludos cordiales Alberto Soto Estimados todos, Estamos complacidos en anunciar que las estructuras de Alcance (ALS) podrán postular para servir como Hubs para facilitar la participación remota durante la reunión de ICANN 51 en Los Angeles, USA a llevarse a cabo entre el 12-16 de Octubre 2014. Los siguientes son detalles importantes: * Tipos de hubs Habrán dos tipos de hubs, 1) Hubs para escuchar solamente (sin límites de números de Hubs ) y 2) Hubs de dos vías - Habrán un máximo de 10 hubs. * Asistencia Multilingüe - Asistencia técnica será disponible en Inglés, Francés y Español para los Hubs aprobados. · Fechas de operación Los Hubs estarán en operación solo un día, el 16 de Octubre. * Reembolso - ICANN ofrecerá reembolso a ALSes seleccionadas que sirvan como Hubs. Detalles adicionales sobre este punto serán publicados en breve. Si vuestra ALS está interesada en postular para servir como Hub, por favor siga los siguientes pasos: · Cumplimiento con los requisitos técnicos Asegúrese que su ALS podrá cumplir con los requisitos, (vea: <https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/48350546/2014-08-15%20Remo te%20Hub%20Technical%20Documentation.pdf?version=1&modificationDate=14084011 18000&api=v2> https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/48350546/2014-08-15%20Remot e%20Hub%20Technical%20Documentation.pdf?version=1&modificationDate=140840111 8000&api=v2) En Inglés solamente por el momento, está siendo traducida a 5 idiomas ONU. · Complete la encuesta online hasta el 12 de Setiembre del 2014 (vea: <https://www.surveymonkey.com/s/3GPZ2SQ> https://www.surveymonkey.com/s/3GPZ2SQ) Puede encontrar información adicional sobre los Hub Remotos At Large de ICANN 51 en el siguiente WIKI (vea: <https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Remote+Hub+for+ICANN+5 1+Workspace> https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Remote+Hub+for+ICANN+51 +Workspace). Saludos cordiales,

1 0

Primer Borrador de Declaración de At-Large sobre Modificación de los Estatutos respecto de las consideraciones del GAC
by Fatima Cambronero Sept. 11, 2014

Sept. 11, 2014

Estimadas/os, Como lo adelantó León ayer en un correo a esta lista, él y yo hemos trabajado como relatores (pen holders) de una declaración sobre este asunto desde ALAC. En dicha declaración hemos tenido en cuenta los comentarios que se han realizado desde LACRALO además de los provenientes desde ALAC. Este primer borrador de declaración se puede encontrar en el siguiente enlace: https://community.icann.org/display/alacpolicydev/At-Large+Proposed+Bylaws+… Este primer borrador de declaración está abierto a comentarios por todo At-Large. No hay todavía plazo asignado para recibir comentarios. Informaremos en esta lista cuando dicho plazo se defina. Saludos cordiales, Fatima Cambronero -- *Fatima Cambronero* Abogada-Argentina Phone: +54 9351 5282 668 Twitter: @facambronero Skype: fatima.cambronero

4 6

RES: Segundo representante INTERNAUTA BRASIL
by sylvia＠internautabrasil.org Sept. 11, 2014

Sept. 11, 2014

Estimado presidente y secretario de LACRALO: Les queremos comunicar a ustedes y a la comunidad de LACRALO que a partir de setiembre 2014, el segundo representante de Internauta Brasil será Emiliano Leite en lugar de Priscila Marcos, presidenta de Internauta Brasil. Emiliano es miembro activo desde el año 2010, ha participado en varios proyectos de inclusión digital. Emiliano es estudiante del último año de la carrera: Análisis y Desarrollo de Sistemas en FATEC, Facultad de Tecnología del Estado de Sao Paulo y actualmente estudiante de intercambio en Indiana University- Boomington -USA. Él estará participando de ICANN 51. Sin más, Sylvia ___________________________________________________ Sylvia Herlein Leite sylvia(a)internautabrasil.org LACRALO-ALAC Delegate to NomComm 2014-2015 Secretaria FLUI 2009-2015 ex - Secretaria LACRALO-ICANN/ 2012-2014 ex ALAC Member 2009-2011 - http://atlarge.icann.org Skype: sylvia_leite -----Mensagem original----- De: lac-discuss-es-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org [mailto:lac-discuss-es-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org] Em nome de Alberto Soto Enviada em: lunes, 01 de septiembre de 2014 17:20 Para: 'LACRALO Español' Assunto: [lac-discuss-es] Segundo representante Estimados, según nuestras normas cada ALS puede tener dos representantes. Uno de ellos es quien es designado por la misma y autorizado a votar, y es a quien se le envían las credenciales correspondientes. Pero en algunas organizaciones, por varias razones el titular puede no estar disponible en algunos momentos y desea que el otro representante tenga la información necesaria. Es por ello que las ALSs que lo deseen, pueden enviarme el nombre y correo del segundo representante para agregarlos en las listas de mails de LACRALO. Siempre permanecerá para la votación el designado oportunamente, hasta que la ALS informe oficialmente un cambio. Saludos cordiales Alberto Soto _______________________________________________ lac-discuss-es mailing list lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es http://www.lacralo.org --- Este mensaje no contiene virus ni malware porque la protección de avast! Antivirus está activa. http://www.avast.com

1 0

Re: [lac-discuss-es] ? = UTF-8 Primer_Borrador_de_Declaraci q = C3 = B3n_de = q = UTF-8 _at-Large_sobre_Modificaci = C3 = B3n_de_los_Estatutos_respe = q = UTF-8 cto_de_las_consideraciones_del_GAC = ????
by bronstein.sergio＠gmail.com Sept. 8, 2014

Sept. 8, 2014

[[--Translated text (en -> es)--]] Asunto: Re:? = UTF-8 Primer_Borrador_de_Declaraci q = C3 = B3n_de = q = UTF-8 _at-Large_sobre_Modificaci = C3 = B3n_de_los_Estatutos_respe = q = UTF-8 cto_de_las_consideraciones_del_GAC = ???? Desde: bronstein.sergio(a)gmail.com El Presidente Santos presento el plan Vive Digital 2014-2018 en ANDICOM 2014 http://www.mintic.gov.co/portal/604/w3-artículo-7080.html El 8 de septiembre de 2014, 12:40, <apisanty(a)gmail.com> escribio: > > [[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] > > Subject: Re:? = Utf-8 Primer_Borrador_de_Declaraci q = C3 = B3n_de = q = > utf-8 _at-Large_sobre_Modificaci = C3 = B3n_de_los_Estatutos_respe = q = > utf-8 cto_de_las_consideraciones_del_GAC =???? > From: apisanty(a)gmail.com > > Alberto, all > > > after the msa background to explore the theme of "GAC advice" on > conversations with various people in the IGF, and other > analysis, I have come to this conclusion: > > > 1 We must continue to put limits to the stealthy penetration of positions > affected control, and specifically why sustain our position > about not increase the specific gravity of the quasi-veto opininy > GAC. > > > 2 We may be losing sight of a key point of the proposal: > explcitos votes in the GAC. The positions of the GAC so obliging > particular the Board must have votes counted. Otherwise estaramos > contine to support a current bad situation.In sta, few > Governments may impose a position that is not offset by the > majority. This seems to be the situation regarding .vin / .wine eg > to cite a particular case, that is not the only one. > > > I propose to modify accordingly the text of our proposal > and actively drive change in the ALAC. > > > Alejandro Pisanty > > > > > 8/23/2014 12:24 GMT-05: 00 Alberto Soto <asoto(a)ibero-americano.org> : > > > > Estimados, estÃ¡bamos preparando nuestro borrador, pero tanto Humberto > como > > yo estamos trabajando coordinadamente con FÃ¡tima (nuestra ALAC Member). > > Ella > > nos avisÃ³ de este documento, hubo una pequeÃ±a demora por un problema en > la > > lista de correo de ALAC (problema tÃ©cnico), pero aquÃ estÃ¡. > > Hasta este momento todas las comunicaciones recibidas en nuestra RegiÃ³n, > > son coincidentes con lo afirmado en el documento, y como dijo Alejandro, > > ninguna en oposiciÃ³n. > > Por lo tanto, adoptamos el mismo como opiniÃ³n de nuestra RegiÃ³n, > > solicitÃ¡ndole al Staff su colaboraciÃ³n para que en la misma wiki sea > > publicado en EspaÃ±ol. Esto para igualar las condiciones que todos > nuestros > > documentos son presentados. > > Ahora solo queda que accedan al mismo en la wiki, y realicen las > > sugerencias > > que consideren como convenientes. Nuestros comentarios serÃ¡n recibidos > > hasta > > el 3 de Septiembre a las 20 UTC > > AquÃ el link corto: http://goo.gl/XYt9FT > > > > Agradezco a FÃ¡tima que nos permita demostrar el trabajo coordinado, que > > permite hacer cosas buenas y ahorrar tiempo y trabajo. > > Saludos cordiales!! > > > > Alberto Soto > > > > -----Mensaje original----- > > De: lac-discuss-es-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > > [mailto:lac-discuss-es-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org] En nombre de > > Fatima > > Cambronero > > Enviado el: viernes, 22 de agosto de 2014 01:01 p.m. > > Para: LACRALO EspaÃ±ol > > Asunto: [lac-discuss-es] Primer Borrador de DeclaraciÃ³n de At-Large sobre > > ModificaciÃ³n de los Estatutos respecto de las consideraciones del GAC > > > > Estimadas/os, > > > > > > > > Como lo adelantÃ³ LeÃ³n ayer en un correo a esta lista, Ã©l y yo hemos > > trabajado como relatores (pen holders) de una declaraciÃ³n sobre este > asunto > > desde ALAC. > > > > > > En dicha declaraciÃ³n hemos tenido en cuenta los comentarios que se han > > realizado desde LACRALO ademÃ¡s de los provenientes desde ALAC. > > > > > > Este primer borrador de declaraciÃ³n se puede encontrar en el siguiente > > enlace: > > > > > https://community.icann.org/display/alacpolicydev/At-Large+Proposed+Bylaws+C > > hanges+Regarding+Consideration+of+GAC+Advice+Workspace > > > > > > > > Este primer borrador de declaraciÃ³n estÃ¡ abierto a comentarios por todo > > At-Large. No hay todavÃa plazo asignado para recibir comentarios. > > Informaremos en esta lista cuando dicho plazo se defina. > > > > > > > > Saludos cordiales, > > > > Fatima Cambronero > > > > > > -- > > *Fatima Cambronero* > > Abogada-Argentina > > > > Phone: +54 9351 5282 668 > > Twitter: @facambronero > > Skype: fatima.cambronero > > _______________________________________________ > > lac-discuss-es mailing list > > lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es > > > > http://www.lacralo.org > > > > _______________________________________________ > > lac-discuss-es mailing list > > lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es > > > > http://www.lacralo.org > > > > > > > > > - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - > Dr. Alejandro Pisanty > School of Chemistry UNAM > 3000 University Av,. 04510 Mexico DF Mexico > + 52-1-5541444475 FROM ABROAD > SMS +525541444475 +525541444475 FROM MEXICO > Blog: http://pisanty.blogspot.com > LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty > Join the group on LinkedIn UNAM, > http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A106C0C8614 > Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty > ---- >> Join ISOC Mexico, http://www.isoc.org > . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . > _______________________________________________ > > > [[--Original text (en) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/58d5b226f9.html --]]

1 0

Re: [lac-discuss-es] [lac-discuss-en] ? = Utf-8 Primer_Borrador_de_Declaraci q = C3 = B3n_de = q = utf-8 _at-Large_sobre_Modificaci = C3 = B3n_de_los_Estatutos_respe = q = utf-8 cto_de_las_consideraciones_del_GAC =????
by Sergio Bronstein Sept. 8, 2014

Sept. 8, 2014

El Presidente Santos presentó el Plan Vive Digital 2014-2018 en ANDICOM 2014 http://www.mintic.gov.co/portal/604/w3-article-7080.html El 8 de septiembre de 2014, 12:40, <apisanty(a)gmail.com> escribió: > > [[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] > > Subject: Re:? = Utf-8 Primer_Borrador_de_Declaraci q = C3 = B3n_de = q = > utf-8 _at-Large_sobre_Modificaci = C3 = B3n_de_los_Estatutos_respe = q = > utf-8 cto_de_las_consideraciones_del_GAC =???? > From: apisanty(a)gmail.com > > Alberto, all > > > after the msa background to explore the theme of "GAC advice" on > conversations with various people in the IGF, and other > analysis, I have come to this conclusion: > > > 1 We must continue to put limits to the stealthy penetration of positions > affected control, and specifically why sustain our position > about not increase the specific gravity of the quasi-veto opininy > GAC. > > > 2 We may be losing sight of a key point of the proposal: > explcitos votes in the GAC. The positions of the GAC so obliging > particular the Board must have votes counted. Otherwise estaramos > contine to support a current bad situation.In sta, few > Governments may impose a position that is not offset by the > majority. This seems to be the situation regarding .vin / .wine eg > to cite a particular case, that is not the only one. > > > I propose to modify accordingly the text of our proposal > and actively drive change in the ALAC. > > > Alejandro Pisanty > > > > > 8/23/2014 12:24 GMT-05: 00 Alberto Soto <asoto(a)ibero-americano.org> : > > > > Estimados, estábamos preparando nuestro borrador, pero tanto Humberto > como > > yo estamos trabajando coordinadamente con Fátima (nuestra ALAC Member). > > Ella > > nos avisó de este documento, hubo una pequeña demora por un problema en > la > > lista de correo de ALAC (problema técnico), pero aquí está. > > Hasta este momento todas las comunicaciones recibidas en nuestra Región, > > son coincidentes con lo afirmado en el documento, y como dijo Alejandro, > > ninguna en oposición. > > Por lo tanto, adoptamos el mismo como opinión de nuestra Región, > > solicitándole al Staff su colaboración para que en la misma wiki sea > > publicado en Español. Esto para igualar las condiciones que todos > nuestros > > documentos son presentados. > > Ahora solo queda que accedan al mismo en la wiki, y realicen las > > sugerencias > > que consideren como convenientes. Nuestros comentarios serán recibidos > > hasta > > el 3 de Septiembre a las 20 UTC > > Aquí el link corto: http://goo.gl/XYt9FT > > > > Agradezco a Fátima que nos permita demostrar el trabajo coordinado, que > > permite hacer cosas buenas y ahorrar tiempo y trabajo. > > Saludos cordiales!! > > > > Alberto Soto > > > > -----Mensaje original----- > > De: lac-discuss-es-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > > [mailto:lac-discuss-es-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org] En nombre de > > Fatima > > Cambronero > > Enviado el: viernes, 22 de agosto de 2014 01:01 p.m. > > Para: LACRALO Español > > Asunto: [lac-discuss-es] Primer Borrador de Declaración de At-Large sobre > > Modificación de los Estatutos respecto de las consideraciones del GAC > > > > Estimadas/os, > > > > > > > > Como lo adelantó León ayer en un correo a esta lista, él y yo hemos > > trabajado como relatores (pen holders) de una declaración sobre este > asunto > > desde ALAC. > > > > > > En dicha declaración hemos tenido en cuenta los comentarios que se han > > realizado desde LACRALO además de los provenientes desde ALAC. > > > > > > Este primer borrador de declaración se puede encontrar en el siguiente > > enlace: > > > > > https://community.icann.org/display/alacpolicydev/At-Large+Proposed+Bylaws+C > > hanges+Regarding+Consideration+of+GAC+Advice+Workspace > > > > > > > > Este primer borrador de declaración está abierto a comentarios por todo > > At-Large. No hay todavía plazo asignado para recibir comentarios. > > Informaremos en esta lista cuando dicho plazo se defina. > > > > > > > > Saludos cordiales, > > > > Fatima Cambronero > > > > > > -- > > *Fatima Cambronero* > > Abogada-Argentina > > > > Phone: +54 9351 5282 668 > > Twitter: @facambronero > > Skype: fatima.cambronero > > _______________________________________________ > > lac-discuss-es mailing list > > lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es > > > > http://www.lacralo.org > > > > _______________________________________________ > > lac-discuss-es mailing list > > lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es > > > > http://www.lacralo.org > > > > > > > > > - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - > Dr. Alejandro Pisanty > School of Chemistry UNAM > 3000 University Av,. 04510 Mexico DF Mexico > + 52-1-5541444475 FROM ABROAD > SMS +525541444475 +525541444475 FROM MEXICO > Blog: http://pisanty.blogspot.com > LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty > Join the group on LinkedIn UNAM, > http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A106C0C8614 > Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty > ---- >> Join ISOC Mexico, http://www.isoc.org > . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . > _______________________________________________ > > > > [[--Original text (es) > http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/ac175c5211.html > --]] > > > > _______________________________________________ > lac-discuss-en mailing list > lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-en > >

1 0

Fwd: [discuss] [ianatransition] Fwd: [IP] WSJ: The Internet Power Vacuum Worsens
by Alejandro Pisanty Sept. 8, 2014

Sept. 8, 2014

Colegas, para mayor claridad sobre mi propuesta, pueden leer este mensaje de Mike Roberts, CEO fundador de ICANN. Alejandro Pisanty ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Mike Roberts <mmr(a)darwin.ptvy.ca.us> Date: Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 10:56 AM Subject: Re: [discuss] [ianatransition] Fwd: [IP] WSJ: The Internet Power Vacuum Worsens To: Miles Fidelman <mfidelman(a)meetinghouse.net> Cc: 1Net List <discuss(a)1net.org>, "ianatransition(a)icann.org" < ianatransition(a)icann.org> Did anyone think that right wing America Firsters wouldn’t use as much FUD as they could muster to try to derail the NTIA initiative? Check some of the Congressional grand stand statements. This mess of mistatement and innuendo is SOP. A “majority” of governments are authoritarian? That’s a pretty big paintbrush. As Jon Postel said way back in 1591, governments do matter. Multistakeholderism without a role for governments isn’t going to work. ICANN is actually trying to smoke out behind the scenes gorilla behavior in the GAC by requiring recorded votes with a majority needed for “advice.” Raising the Board threshold for rejecting the advice is a nominal quid pro quo with little effect. - Mike On Sep 8, 2014, at 6:49 AM, Miles Fidelman <mfidelman(a)meetinghouse.net> wrote: Well, isn't this a nice kettle of fish. -------- Forwarded Message -------- The Internet Power Vacuum Worsens The U.S. hasn't even abandoned its Web protection yet, and authoritarians are making their move. By L. GORDON CROVIT Sept. 7, 2014 5:11 p.m. ET The Obama administration plan to give up U.S. protection of the open Internet won't take effect for a year, but authoritarian governments are already moving to grab control. President Obama is learning it's as dangerous for America to create a vacuum of power in the digital world as in the real one. In March the administration asked Icann, the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers, to suggest a plan for overseeing the Internet after September 2015, when U.S. governance is scheduled to end. The U.S. charged this group, which maintains the root-zone file of domain names and addresses, with somehow finding mechanisms to prevent other governments from undermining the permissionless, free-speech Internet built under U.S. oversight. Instead, Icann set up a process to hand control over to governments. Under the current "multistakeholder" system, an advisory group of governments has only as much power as other stakeholders, such as Web registries, website owners, free-speech groups and other nonprofits. But in August, Icann quietly proposed changing its bylaws to rubber-stamp government decisions unless two-thirds of the Icann board objects. In turn, Iran has proposed that the government group move to majority voting from the current consensus approach. That would enable the world's majority of authoritarian governments to rewire the Internet more to their liking. Enlarge Image Agence France-Presse/Getty Images What will this mean? Authoritarian governments could for the first time censor the Web globally, not just in their own countries. Russia could get Icann to withdraw Ukrainian sites. China could engineer the world-wide removal of sites supporting freedom for Hong Kong or Tibet. Iran could censor its critics in the U.S. Website operators could also expect new global fees and regulations. Such a change "would fundamentally transform Icann away from being a 'bottom-up' and 'private sector-led' organization and into a governmental regulatory agency," wrote Robin Gross, a former chairman of the Icann group representing nonprofits, on the CircleID blog. "Why Icann would voluntarily choose to empower non-democratic governments with an even greater say over global Internet policies as this bylaw change would do is anyone's guess." The Internet Commerce Association, which represents Web businesses, warns that the proposal "would transform Icann into a government-led organization," which is "completely counter" to the U.S. requirement that the Internet remain free of government control. In a speech in July, a U.S. Commerce Departmentofficial played down the danger. "The idea that governments could enhance their influence within Icann by changing its rules to allow for a majority vote on policy issues reflects a misunderstanding of the policymaking process at Icann," said Assistant Secretary Lawrence Strickling. Wrong. Mr. Strickling and his administration colleagues have misunderstood how serious other governments are about filling the vacuum of power with repression. Icann also upset all its major stakeholder groups by ignoring their demand to make it more accountable absent U.S. oversight. Stakeholders had instructed Icann to create an "independent accountability mechanism that provides meaningful review and adequate redress for those harmed by Icann action or inaction in contravention of an agreed-upon compact with the community." Instead, Icann announced that it would oversee itself. A dozen stakeholder groups quickly sent Icann chief Fadi Chehade a letter objecting. "How does Icann intend to handle the inherent conflict of interest with developing its own accountability plan?" they asked. "Why didn't Icann invite proposals from the community and why wasn't the community involved in the drafting of the staff plan?" An objection sent jointly by business and nonprofit stakeholder groups to the Icann board said: "This plan, imposed on the community without transparency and without the opportunity for public comment, creates inconsistency, disregards proper Icann procedure, injects unfairness into the process and defeats the purpose of the entire accountability examination." Philip Corwin, a lawyer specializing in Icann issues, calls pushback against the organization "unprecedented." Last week, Icann agreed to put off the new rules, but only for a brief comment period. Much of the blame for the splintering of the multistakeholder system lies with Mr. Obama's naïveté in putting Internet governance up for grabs. He underestimated the importance of Washington's control in maintaining an open Internet—and the desire among other governments to close the Internet. And there still is no plan to keep Icann free from control by governments. Administration officials pledged to Congress that the U.S. would keep control over the Internet if the alternative was to empower other governments or if there isn't full accountability for Icann. Both red lines have been crossed. If Mr. Obama persists, Congress should block his plan with a simple message: The open Internet is too valuable to surrender. 1. <http://online.wsj.com/articles/l-gordon-crovitz-the-internet-power-vacuum-w…> Archives <https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/247/=now> <https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/247/125967-13f5c010> | Modify <https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=125967&id_secret=125967-2be3cd17> Your Subscription | Unsubscribe Now <https://www.listbox.com/unsubscribe/?member_id=125967&id_secret=125967-6e7c…> <http://www.listbox.com/> _______________________________________________ ianatransition mailing list ianatransition(a)icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ianatransition _______________________________________________ discuss mailing list discuss(a)1net.org http://1net-mail.1net.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dr. Alejandro Pisanty Facultad de Química UNAM Av. Universidad 3000, 04510 Mexico DF Mexico +52-1-5541444475 FROM ABROAD +525541444475 DESDE MÉXICO SMS +525541444475 Blog: http://pisanty.blogspot.com LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty Unete al grupo UNAM en LinkedIn, http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A106C0C8614 Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty ---->> Unete a ISOC Mexico, http://www.isoc.org . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

1 0

Re: Fwd: Agenda | Nuevo Comit� de Programa de gTLD
by greenberg.alan＠gmail.com Sept. 7, 2014

Sept. 7, 2014

[[--Translated text (en -> es)--]] Asunto: Re: Fwd: Agenda | Nuevo Comité de Programa de gTLD Desde: greenberg.alan(a)gmail.com Se trata de una presunta ratificación de las conclusiones de la Junta Comité de Gobierno rechaza la petición en todos los terrenos - https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/recommendation-amazon-22aug14-e…. Alan Al 07.09.2014 04 a.m., Carlton Samuels escribió: > La Comisión del Consejo sobre el Programa de nuevos gTLD parece que va a tomar un > Reconsideración de Amazon EU Sarl > > -Carlton > > ============================== > Carlton A Samuels > Mobile: 876-818-1799 > * Estrategia, Planificación, Gobierno, Evaluación y Turnaround * > ============================= > > > From: >https://www.icann.org/resources/board-material/agenda-new-gtld-2014-09-08-en > >Agenda | New gTLD Program Committee > >08 Sep 2014 > >Consent Agenda > >* Approval of Minutes from 21 June 2014, 18 July 2014 and 30 July 2014 > >Main Agenda > >* GAC Advice Scorecard > >* BGC Recommendation on Reconsideration Request 14-27, Amazon EU S.a.r.l. > >* Perceived Inconsistent String Confusion Expert Determinations > >* AOB > >Published on 3 September 2014 >David A. Olive >Sent from my iPad >_______________________________________________ >At-Large mailing list >At-Large(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org >https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large > >At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org [[--Original text (en) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/769770cef9.html --]]

1 0