March 2012 - lac-discuss-es

Re: [lac-discuss-es] =? Iso-8859-1? Q? Convocatoria_de_candidaturas_para? == Iso-8859-1? Q? _la_LACRALO_Presidente_y_la_Secretar = EDa_para_2012-? == Iso-8859-1? Q? 2013? =
by cintra.sooknanan＠gmail.com March 5, 2012

March 5, 2012

[[--Translated text (en -> es)--]] Asunto: Re: =? Iso-8859-1? Q? Convocatoria_de_candidaturas_para? == Iso-8859-1? Q? _la_LACRALO_Presidente_y_la_Secretar = EDa_para_2012-? == Iso-8859-1? Q? 2013? = De: cintra.sooknanan(a)gmail.com Sí, es muy interesante Jacqueline, Todavía estoy esperando con ansiedad una respuesta de Fátima, el escritor de las propuestas y el proponente de la Sylvia. Ambos de los cuales estaban al tanto de otros propuestas del Grupo de Trabajo. Me parece que es inaceptable e insuficiente para decir "modificar las propuestas, si desea "en este momento tantos días después del engaño fue establecido y tan cerca a nuestra fecha límite. Con la fe en un lacralo más brillante, Cintra El Sol, 04 de marzo 2012 a las 9:04 PM, Jacqueline Morris <jam(a)jacquelinemorris.com> escribió: > I'm confused by all these references to working in secret. Is this a > translation issue, or as Cintra indicated in her email this morning, a > plan to deliberately sideline some members of the LACRALO? > All these comments are tending to make me think there are some real > shady activities going on in LACRALO? > As far as I know, the rules are there, and even if they were > suspended, ignored or broken in 2009, why should we continue doing the > wrong thing in 2012? > > Jacqueline A. Morris > Technology should be like oxygen: Ubiquitous, Necessary, Invisible and > Free. (after Chris Lehmann ) > > > > On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 7:53 PM, <asoto(a)ibero-americano.org> wrote: > > > > [[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] > > > > Subject: Re: =? Iso-8859-1? Q? Convocatoria_de_candidaturas_para? == > Iso-8859-1? Q? _la_LACRALO_Presidente_y_la_Secretar = EDa_para_2012-? == > Iso-8859-1? Q? 2013? = > > From: asoto(a)ibero-americano.org > > > > Dear Dev and all > > > > > > Dev, this is a paragraph shall send for you, "Asel artculo 13 is > especfico > > with respect to the choice of representatives LACRALO required a > > two months' notice before any LACRALO Assembly convened for > > elect representatives of LACRALO. Given that The term > > of one year of the President and secrete ending April 14, 2012, the > > call for applications must have started before mid- > > February 2012 in LACRALO distribution list, but with the > > LACRALO planning of events in Costa Rica, this call does not > > was made. " > > > > > > In fact, if The term of President and Secretary expires on 14 March > > 2012, according to these articles the choice should call for having > > made by the Secretary before February 9, 2012.And was not > > breach of the provisions of the ROP. If requested by the choice > hubiramos > > the AG in Costa Rica, Cundo had made the choice? Despus of > > the date of term? > > > > > > Also I have seen several comments requesting compliance with the rules, > and > > including a possible veto According the last conference call, which only > > I will join Adobe and haltingly because of bad > > communication in my home. Unattested it were not veto or by whom. > > Also comments on misrepresentations mails or work in secret. > > > > > > In principle, I am attached to the rules, and therefore particularly > > I demand. I see that in the General Assembly of Mxico not filled in > > so, now the call for elections of President and Secretary, > > either. In turn we ask flexibilizacin so they can register > > two LAs than most think that should not be released. > > And estexigiendo the compliance, but to the letter. There > > an obvious contradiction ... > > Really, I insist, I'm stuck to the rules, but to require > > must first be met and became aquno or esthaciendo.No > > groups working in secret or misrepresenting things, only people working, > > setting an example to other members of the LAs. Pro other hand, there > > another course of action, require no foundation and unfulfilled, really > > removes the desire to work. And that was not settled with a session of > > concientizacino knowledge with us in Costa Rica. Only > > conducciny transparent management in the example, must motivation for > > it. > > I think they've completed all the orders that had secreted > > done, and I would like to see this track in a good way, not > > intiles confrontations and hostile comments that do not lead > > absolutely nothing. > > If this is ace, I have thought about my trip and desist from removing > the Institute > > as ALS. I want to work, I will not discuss intilmente and no results. > > And really want to get, for the sake of Internet users, not > > by us. > > Best Regards > > > > > > Alberto Soto > > Director IIISI > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: lac-discuss-es-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > > [Mailto: lac-discuss-es-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org] On Behalf Of > > devtee(a)gmail.com > > Posted on: Sunday, March 4, 2012 1:05 a.m. > > To: lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > > Subject: Call for nominations for President and LACRALO > > Secreted for 2012-2013 > > > > > > > > > > [[- Translated text (in -> en) -]] > > > > > > Subject: Call for nominations for President and LACRALO > > Secreted for 2012-2013 > > From: devtee(a)gmail.com > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > > > > > According to the Organization of LACRALO Documents ( > > https://community.icann.org/x/Oo0i) > > LACRALO and secrete LACRALO is one year each. > > The terms of the current president and secrete LACRALO finalizarel > > April 15, 2012. > > > > > > > > > > The current president is JosFrancisco LACRALO Maple Ageia Densi > > Argentina's current LACRALO is secreted Teelucksingh of Dev Anand > > Trinidad and Tobago Computer Society > > > > > > > > > > If there is any representative of an ALS accredited LACRALO > > vlidas that wishes are for either > > - The president of LACRALO. > > or > > - The position of secreted LACRALO, > > > > > > > > > > ENVE an email to the Secretariat in admin(a)ttcsweb.org. > > > > > > > > > > Note: > > In accordance with the Rules of Procedure of the LACRALO, nominations > > will be accepted by a period minimum of 4 weeks from the date of > > the call for Nominations, with the choice that no tendrlugar > > within 48 hours after the expiry of 8 weeks from the > > date of the call for nominations. (Rules 13.1, 13.2, 13.3) > > > > > > > > > > However, a GA was carried out LACRALO for the ingathering of ICANN > > Costa Rica, Wednesdays from March 14, 2012. > > > > > > > > > > Several ALS have expressed their intention to submit motions to the > Assembly > > General > > allow the election of President and secrete LACRALO to take > > place during the General Assembly. If these motions are approved by the > > Assembly > > then presented the list of candidates considered for this > > type > > choice. > > > > > > > > > > --- > > > > > > > > > > Best regards, > > > > > > > > > > Dev Anand Teelucksingh > > LACRALO Secretariat > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [[--Original text (en) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/724175f3cd.html --]]

2 1

Por favor, distribuya - Panel sobre las TIC y los PEID - participar en l�nea - 12 de marzo de 2012 (14:30-16:00 hora est�ndar del este)
by cintra.sooknanan＠gmail.com March 4, 2012

March 4, 2012

[[--Translated text (en -> es)--]] Asunto: Por favor, distribuya - Panel sobre las TIC y los PEID - participar en línea - 12 de marzo de 2012 (14:30-16:00 hora estándar del este) De: cintra.sooknanan(a)gmail.com De interés Cintra ---------- Mensaje reenviado ---------- De: Dhanaraj Thakur <pureart100-mail(a)yahoo.com> Fecha: Sun, 04 de marzo 2012 a las 3:55 pm Asunto: [Alumnos-NGL] Por favor, distribuya - Panel sobre las TIC y los PEID - participar en línea - 12 de marzo de 2012 (14:30-16:00 Hora Estándar del Este) Para: alumni-ngl(a)elists.isoc.org Hola a todos, esto podría ser en el interés de algunos miembros. ten cuidado, Dhanaraj ------------------------------ * * * Invitación a participar en un Panel de Discusión: Tecnologías de la Información y Comunicación (TIC) y los Pequeños Estados Insulares en Desarrollo (SIDS) * Queremos invitarle a unirse a nosotros en línea para una mesa redonda sobre las TIC y Los pequeños Estados insulares, que se llevará a cabo en la Quinta Conferencia Internacional sobre Tecnologías de la Información y la Comunicación y el Desarrollo (ICTD2012), Atlanta, EE.UU., de lunes *, 12 de marzo 2012 14:30-16:00 (Eastern Standard tiempo). * Para seguir los debates en vivo y participar en línea por favor, únase a nosotros en: * https://www4.gotomeeting.com/register/813799999 * El objetivo de este panel es examinar las distintas formas en que las TIC pueden ser utilizada para superar los desafíos de desarrollo únicos que se enfrentan los Los pequeños Estados insulares. El tema será abordado por los panelistas de unas perspectivas de variedades incluyendo: - Christina Higa, Director de EducaciÃ³n de Pan-PacÃfico y de la ComunicaciÃ³n Los experimentos realizados por SatÃ©lite (PEACESAT), Hawai, EE.UU. - * Servicio Universal y el Servicio PÃºblico de las TIC para el Desarrollo: Experiencias del PacÃfico Island *. - Ilan Kelman, Senior Research Fellow del Centro de Internacional sobre el Clima e InvestigaciÃ³n del Medio Ambiente, Oslo, Noruega - * "** los pequeÃ±os Estados insulares y las TIC: Las solicitudes para la ReducciÃ³n del Riesgo de Desastres, incluido el cambio climÃ¡tico AdaptaciÃ³n ** "*. - Dhanaraj Thakur, profesor del Departamento de Gobierno de la Universidad de las Indias Occidentales, Jamaica. - * "Nacionales de TIC polÃticas en el contexto los pequeÃ±os Estados insulares". * - Elena De JesÃºs, Director Asociado de Desarrollo Sostenible, Unidad de SIDS, De las Naciones Unidas Departamento de Asuntos EconÃ³micos y Sociales - "* TIC y Medidas de coordinaciÃ³n a travÃ©s de los pequeÃ±os Estados insulares: los pequeÃ±os Estados insulares Red "* El panel serÃ¡ presidido por el profesor Gillian Marcelle (Escuela de Negocios de Wits, Ãfrica del Sur). Tenga en cuenta que no hay costo para participar en lÃnea. Esperamos contar con su asistencia. https://www4.gotomeeting.com/register/813799999 ------------------------------ _______________________________________________ [[--Original text (en) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/1b72b5593c.html --]]

1 0

Recordatorio para enviar un video / foto / presentaci�n sobre sus ELA para el escaparate LACRALO
by devtee＠gmail.com March 4, 2012

March 4, 2012

[[--Translated text (en -> es)--]] Asunto: Recordatorio para enviar un video / foto / presentación sobre sus ELA para el escaparate LACRALO De: devtee(a)gmail.com Queridos todos, Sólo un recordatorio de que el tiempo se acaba para una licencia previa para presentar un corto video, foto presentación de diapositivas o una presentación sobre sus ELA para jugar en una pantalla en el escaparate de LACRALO. Su vídeo de corta duración, proyección de diapositivas de fotos, o presentación debe ser en virtud de un minuto de duración y no debe contener ningún audio. Por favor enviar su video ELA, pase de diapositivas o presentación por De martes a josefranciscoarce(a)gmail.com y admin(a)ttcsweb.org en el muy reciente. Gracias y Saludos cordiales, Dev Anand Teelucksingh LACRALO Secretaría _______________________________________________ [[--Original text (en) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/2e08bfab4b.html --]]

1 0

RECORDATORIO: invitaci�n a la reuni�n / At-Large de llamadas Informaci�n sobre Cuestiones de WHOIS - lunes 05 marzo a las 18:00 UTC
by staff＠atlarge.icann.org March 4, 2012

March 4, 2012

[[--Translated text (en -> es)--]] Asunto: RECORDATORIO: invitación a la reunión / At-Large de llamadas Información sobre Cuestiones de WHOIS - lunes 05 marzo a las 18:00 UTC De: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org Queridos todos, Carlton Samuels, el Presidente del Grupo de At-Large de WHOIS de Trabajo, tiene solicitó que el personal de At-Large organizará una llamada informativa de At-Large en el WHOIS cuestiones. Los temas a ser discutidos en la presente convocatoria incluirá información de base sobre la ICANN WHOIS marco, incluidas las actividades políticas de la GNSO WHOIS, una breve actualización de la WHOIS desafíos de cumplimiento, las iniciativas de socorro y los resultados hasta la fecha y WHOIS RT revisión destaca. La convocatoria está programada para el lunes 05 de marzo 2012 a las 18:00 UTC. Para otros horarios: http://tinyurl.com/76e6rjj El proyecto de programa y los detalles de participación están disponibles en: https://community.icann.org/x/vJ3bAQ < https://community.icann.org/x/vJ3bAQ> Adobe Connect: http://icann.adobeconnect.com/atlargewhois/ Por favor, háganos saber si usted requiere una línea telefónica y por correo electrónico <mailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org> staff(a)atlarge.icann.org~~V. Gracias. Un cordial saludo, Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Matt Ashtiani, Gisela Gruber y Nathalie Peregrino de la ICANN At-Large Personal E-mail: <mailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org> staff(a)atlarge.icann.org~~V _______________________________________________ [[--Original text (en) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/29176ed0e1.html --]]

1 0

mis comentarios relacionados con la Enmienda
by vanda＠uol.com.br March 4, 2012

March 4, 2012

[[--Translated text (en -> es)--]] Asunto: mis comentarios relacionados con la Enmienda De: vanda(a)uol.com.br Aquí mi análisis a compartir con ustedes todo lo relacionado con las enmiendas propuestas. Yo no estoy seguro por mi compromiso con NOMCOMM si se va a poder participar en todas las sesiones, así que decidí compartir mis opiniones con todos ustedes. Señala que tengo algo que decir en el más destacado a continuación. Gracias VANDA Puntos propuestos por un grupo Mis comentarios 1) el derecho de ALS para votar en los asuntos LACRALO determinado por un nivel mínimo de participación Esto es positivo 2) los idiomas de trabajo ampliado para francés y portugués No veo la necesidad y puede ser demasiado caro. Pero esto no es una preocupación principal. (Pero no veo APRALO de trabajo en los más de 20 idiomas que tienen hay 3) elimina el concepto de funcionamiento por consenso > Desde mi punto de vista esto es contra uno de los principio de la ICANN a construir consenso 4) creación de Vicepresidente Aquellas personas no se puede añadir a la representación normal en ALAC sin la decisión de ALAC sí mismo. No es para LACRALO para decidir. Véase también más adelante en el el tema 8 5) Las cláusulas de Presidente y Vicepresidente que pueden optar a dos mandatos de dos años cada uno Este hacer un poco de sentido, ya que la representación en ALAC exige un cierto grado de el aprendizaje, por lo que un aÃ±o es de corto plazo por cierto. Pero el segundo tÃ©rmino serÃ¡ un aÃ±o para permitir a otros a participar. 6) creaciÃ³n de la posiciÃ³n de Vice-SecretarÃa Igual de vicepresidente 7) LACRALO elegirÃ¡ a 2 personas para formar parte de ALAC y otros 2 como su respectivos suplentes (los requisitos de la diversidad no se aplicarÃ¡ a elecciÃ³n ALAC miembro y su suplente). No estoy de acuerdo - la diversidad se aplicarÃ¡. Los principios de la ICANN sobre los estados diversidad.La concentraciÃ³n de personas de un solo paÃs, por ejemplo, no es democrÃ¡tico ni segura para la organizaciÃ³n. (Imagino que si los dos grandes paÃses de MÃ©xico y Brasil decide hacer un movimiento fuerte para tomar en este grupo, se pueden controlar todas las posiciones) realmente no es seguro. Debe tiene la diversidad. 8) El suplente o adjunto puede asumir el representante de ALAC en caso de cualquier incapacidad del principal representante de ALAC Creo que esta serÃ¡ sometida a ALAC, no podemos decidir la prÃ³xima vez miembro enviarÃ¡ a la reuniÃ³n de ALAC es otro 9) el miembro de ALAC pueden ser reelegidos por un perÃodo de 2 Âº aÃ±o dos La reelecciÃ³n tiene el mismo principio de un aÃ±o para un segundo mandato para permitir que otros participar. 10) creaciÃ³n de un Directorio de LACRALO o de la Junta con la LACRALO administrativa y las funciones operativas. Se incluyen aquÃ las personas elegidas en la LACRALO (Presidente, Vicepresidente, Secretario, Vicesecretario, la LACRALO dos los representantes elegidos a la ALAC y sus suplentes) y PolÃtica de cinco Los directores que lleven diferentes grupos de trabajo dentro de LACRALO y en encargado de seleccionar a los miembros dentro de sus grupos de trabajo.Directores de PolÃtica serÃan elegidos por la Asamblea General por mayorÃa simple. En mi opiniÃ³n, esto significarÃ¡ demasiado generales y no para comandar las tropas pero no afecta en absoluto. 3 serÃa bueno uno de los miembros de la regiÃ³n del Caribe y dos de AmÃ©rica regiÃ³n tambiÃ©n mantener la diversidad y al mismo tiempo ser razonable (no hay miembros tanto de que realmente funciona en LACRALO asÃ que no creo que serÃ¡ grupos lo suficiente para trabajar menores de 5 directores de polÃtica). Pero no es tan relevante 11) establece que las elecciones puedan llevarse a cabo casi Esto es bueno, pero necesita herramientas claras deben estar disponibles para evitar que uno de los miembros a votar por todos los ALS bajo su mando - sÃ³lo permiten esto despuÃ©s de comprobar la seguridad de la herramienta. 12) las modificaciones serÃan aplicables a los mandatos vigentes del Presidente, Secretario Yo no soy partidario de que, si iba a tener un plazo sÃ³lo un aÃ±o mÃ¡s. La aplicaciÃ³n del cambio en beneficio de los miembros elegidos existentes mira manipulaciÃ³n. La misma gente puede ser candidato y ser elegido, pero la ampliaciÃ³n del mandato, mira no es democrÃ¡tica. Esa es la forma ditactors utilizar para mantener en su lugar Totalmente en contra. 13) La constituciÃ³n de la Junta de LACRALO se celebrarÃ¡ despuÃ©s de la primera elecciÃ³n que se celebrarÃ¡ inmediatamente en el momento de estas reformas se aprueban. No es tan relevante. Vanda Scartezini Acesse: http://nomcom.icann.org correo candidato-se! Acceso: http://nomcom.icann.org y aplicar! Polo Consultores Asociados Tendencia de TI Alameda Santos 1470 conj. 1407 01418-903 SÃ£o Paulo, SP, Brasil Tel. + 5511 3266.6253 MÃ³vil + 55118181.1464 Dissemine this idia: Digite o Dominio de investi ao no telefono. Dominio de marcaciÃ³n Descrio: Descrio: Siter-16-square.png <http://www.siter.com> www.siter.com [[--Original text (en) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/ed3c382abc.html --]]

2 1

Re: [lac-discuss-es] mis comentarios relacionados con la Enmienda
by cintra.sooknanan＠gmail.com March 4, 2012

March 4, 2012

[[--Translated text (en -> es)--]] Asunto: Re: mis comentarios relacionados con la Enmienda De: cintra.sooknanan(a)gmail.com Estimado Vanda, Gracias por su contribución y observaciones. Tal vez esta discusión también dará lugar a una reforma de la forma en la Ley por Grupo de Trabajo ha estado operando de manera que produzca resultados tangibles, en lugar del secreto y la tergiversación. Saludos cordiales Cintra El Sol, 04 de marzo 2012 a las 12:12 PM, Vanda UOL <vanda(a)uol.com.br> escribió: > Well, my comments where based on the assumption that all the WG members > were aware of the proposal, and agreed with it. > If there is no such internal agreement than better to put over the table > all other proposals too, at least to be fair, but especially to follow the > principles under ICANN. > Cintra, your proposal to invite the opinion of the At Large's Regional > Coordination Team, looks very positive in my opinion and I encourage the > WG, > you include to do so! > Best and Abrazos a tout > > -----Mensagem original----- > De: lac-discuss-es-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > [mailto:lac-discuss-es-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org] Em nome de Cintra > Sooknanan > Enviada em: domingo, 4 de março de 2012 11:19 > Para: lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > Cc: Heidi Ullrich; ICANN At-Large Staff; > lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > Assunto: Re: [lac-discuss-es] [lac-discuss-en] my comments related the > ammendment > > Greetings Lacralo, > > Upon review of the proposals I must express my displeasure with the > drafting > which totally disregards the proposals made by Caribbean ALSes both > publicly > on the list and calls, and internally to the By Law Modification Working > Group. The fact that our point of view was not captured in this document > demonstrates clearly that the drafter was not objective and only chose to > represent the proposals of herself and a segment of Lacralo. Was this > action > meant to fraction our relations and sideline my sub-region further, or is > it > simply a matter of ignorance on the part of the writer? I ask you to > consider the answer. > > This proposed vision of the new Lacralo is an administrative blunder. It is > top heavy, disregards diversity, usurps the role of ALAC and ICANN, has no > mechanisms for encouraging Participation and shows a clear lack of > understanding of the responsibility of elected members. I am heartened by > Vanda's contribution and hopeful that this wisdom will be heeded. I also > wish to make a formal request that in moving forward with any structural > Lacralo changes that we seek advice from our At Large's Regional > Coordination Team, who are well experienced and knowledgeable in this area, > having overseen structural changes in other Ralos. > > By way of background I have been on this working group since the Cartagena > meeting in 2010 and this is the first time there has been any indication of > the formation of a board of directors. It is alarming to me that it has > been > put to Lacralo without any discussion and represented as the work of the By > Law Modification Working Group. In fact, while I am in agreement with > Vanda's points, I differ in opinion on her point 10) which refers to the > Lacralo Directory Board. I request the writer of these proposals to explain > the reasoning behind the Lacralo Directory Board and as a matter of urgency > to save her reputation by sending a revised draft of proposals which > captures ALL the amendments proposed by the By Law Modification Working > Group. > > Thank you > > Cintra Sooknanan > > On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 6:39 PM, <vanda(a)uol.com.br> wrote: > > > > > [[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] > > > > Subject: my comments related the ammendment > > From: vanda(a)uol.com.br > > > > Here my analysis to share with you all related to the Proposal > > Amendments. I am not sure my due if I commit with NOMCOMM will will > > be Able to Participate in all sessions, so I Decided to share my > > opinions are With All of you. > > > > > > Point I have something to say in highlight below. > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > VANDA > > > > > > > > > > Points Proposed by one group > > > > > > My comments > > > > > > > > > > 1) the right to vote in ALSes of affairs LACRALO Determined by a > > minimum level of participation > > > > > > This is positive > > > > > > > > > > 2) working languages \u200b\u200bFrench and Portuguese expanded to > > > > > > I dont see need and may be too expensive. But this is not a main > > concern '. > > (But I dont see APRALO working in the more than 20 languages > > \u200b\u200bThey Have there > > > > > > > > > > 3) Removes the concept of operating by consensus > From my point of > > view this is one of ICANNs Principle Against build consensus > > > > > > > > > > 4) creation of Vice President > > > > > > Those persons can not be added to the normal representation without > > at ALAC the decision of ALAC itself. Not for LACRALO to decide. See > > also below on item 8 > > > > > > > > > > 5) terms of President and Vice President for two terms of eligible 2 > > Each years > > > > > > This make some sense, since representation in ALAC Demands Some > > degree of learning, so one year is short term indeed. But the second > > term Shall Be one year to allow Others to Participate. > > > > > > > > > > 6) creation position of Vice Secretariat > > > > > > Same vice president of > > > > > > > > > > 7) LACRALO would serve to elect 2 persons and 2 Others on ALAC as > > Their > > > > > > respective alternates (diversity not apply to Marshall Requirements > > Elected ALAC member and Their alternate). > > > > > > I disagree - diversity Shall apply. The Principles of ICANN states on > > diversity.The concentration of persons from just one country for > > instance, Neither is not safe for the Democratic organization. > > (Imagine if the two Mexico and Brazil big country clubs decide to > > make a strong movement to take over this group, can be all the > > control positions) really not safe. Must Have diversity. > > > > > > > > > > 8) The alternate or deputy can assume the ALAC rep in case of Any > > Inability of the primary ALAC rep > > > > > > I Believe This Shall be submitted to ALAC, We can not decide the next > > time member sat to ALAC meeting is another > > > > > > > > > > 9) the ALAC member can be re-Elected for a two year term 2nd > > > > > > Reelection has the Same Principle 1 year for second term to allow > > Others to Participate. > > > > > > > > > > 10) creation of a LACRALO LACRALO Directory Board with administrative > > or and operative functions. This will Comprise the persons Elected in > > LACRALO (President, Vice-President, Secretary, Deputy Secretary, the > > two LACRALO Elected Representatives and Their alternates to ALAC) and > > five Policy Directors who would lead Different working groups within > > The LACRALO and in Selecting members within The charge of Their > > working groups.Policy Directors would be Elected by the General > > Assembly by simple Majority. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In my opinion This Will mean too much and not generals to command > > Troops Impact but no at all. > > > > > > 3 would be good one member of Caribbean region and two from Latin > > region too keep at Same Time diversity and be reasonable (there is no > > members that really works much in so I dont LACRALO believe it will be > > enough groups to work under 5 policy directors). But not so relevant > > > > > > > > > > 11) Establishing elections can take place That Virtually > > > > > > This is good, but needs clear tools available to Avoid Must be one > > member to vote for all the ALS under ITS command - Allow This only > > after check the security of the tool. > > > > > > > > > > 12) Amendments would be applicable to Existing mandates of President, > > Secretary > > > > > > I am not in behalf of That, only if WAS To Have Just One More year term. > > > > > > Application of the change in benefice of the Existing Elected members > > looks manipulation. > > > > > > Same people can be candidate and be Elected, But Extending the > > mandate, looks not Democratic. Thats the way ditactors use to keeping > > in place Totally Against. > > > > > > > > > > 13) The constitution of the Board of LACRALO be Held after the first > > Immediately election to be Held at the time of These Amendments be > > approved. > > > > > > Not so relevant. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Vanda Scartezini > > > > > > Acesse: http://nomcom.icann.org and candidate-it! > > > > > > Access: http://nomcom.icann.org and apply! > > > > > > Polo Consulting Associates > > > > > > IT Trend > > > > > > Alameda Santos 1470 conj. 1407 > > > > > > 01418-903 So Paulo, SP, Brazil > > > > > > Tel + 5511 3266.6253 > > > > > > Mob + 55118181.1464 > > > > > > Dissemine this idia: > > > > > > Enter or domain ao telefone do research. > > > > > > Domain dialing > > > > > > Descrio: Descrio: Siter-16-square.png <http://www.siter.com> > > www.siter.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [[--Original text (en) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/2f5b293b75.html --]]

1 0

Re: [lac-discuss-es] [lac-discuss-en] my comments related the ammendment
by Cintra Sooknanan March 4, 2012

March 4, 2012

Greetings Lacralo, Upon review of the proposals I must express my displeasure with the drafting which totally disregards the proposals made by Caribbean ALSes both publicly on the list and calls, and internally to the By Law Modification Working Group. The fact that our point of view was not captured in this document demonstrates clearly that the drafter was not objective and only chose to represent the proposals of herself and a segment of Lacralo. Was this action meant to fraction our relations and sideline my sub-region further, or is it simply a matter of ignorance on the part of the writer? I ask you to consider the answer. This proposed vision of the new Lacralo is an administrative blunder. It is top heavy, disregards diversity, usurps the role of ALAC and ICANN, has no mechanisms for encouraging Participation and shows a clear lack of understanding of the responsibility of elected members. I am heartened by Vanda's contribution and hopeful that this wisdom will be heeded. I also wish to make a formal request that in moving forward with any structural Lacralo changes that we seek advice from our At Large's Regional Coordination Team, who are well experienced and knowledgeable in this area, having overseen structural changes in other Ralos. By way of background I have been on this working group since the Cartagena meeting in 2010 and this is the first time there has been any indication of the formation of a board of directors. It is alarming to me that it has been put to Lacralo without any discussion and represented as the work of the By Law Modification Working Group. In fact, while I am in agreement with Vanda's points, I differ in opinion on her point 10) which refers to the Lacralo Directory Board. I request the writer of these proposals to explain the reasoning behind the Lacralo Directory Board and as a matter of urgency to save her reputation by sending a revised draft of proposals which captures ALL the amendments proposed by the By Law Modification Working Group. Thank you Cintra Sooknanan On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 6:39 PM, <vanda(a)uol.com.br> wrote: > > [[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] > > Subject: my comments related the ammendment > From: vanda(a)uol.com.br > > Here my analysis to share with you all related to the Proposal > Amendments. I > am not sure my due if I commit with NOMCOMM will will be Able to > Participate > in all sessions, so I Decided to share my opinions are With All of you. > > > Point I have something to say in highlight below. > > > Thanks > > > VANDA > > > > > Points Proposed by one group > > > My comments > > > > > 1) the right to vote in ALSes of affairs LACRALO Determined by a > minimum level of participation > > > This is positive > > > > > 2) working languages \u200b\u200bFrench and Portuguese expanded to > > > I dont see need and may be too expensive. But this is not a main concern > '. > (But I dont see APRALO working in the more than 20 languages > \u200b\u200bThey Have > there > > > > > 3) Removes the concept of operating by consensus > > From my point of view this is one of ICANNs Principle Against build > consensus > > > > > 4) creation of Vice President > > > Those persons can not be added to the normal representation without at > ALAC > the decision of ALAC itself. Not for LACRALO to decide. See also below on > item 8 > > > > > 5) terms of President and Vice President for two terms of eligible 2 > Each years > > > This make some sense, since representation in ALAC Demands Some degree of > learning, so one year is short term indeed. But the second term Shall Be > one year to allow Others to Participate. > > > > > 6) creation position of Vice Secretariat > > > Same vice president of > > > > > 7) LACRALO would serve to elect 2 persons and 2 Others on ALAC as Their > > > respective alternates (diversity not apply to Marshall Requirements > Elected > ALAC member and Their alternate). > > > I disagree - diversity Shall apply. The Principles of ICANN states on > diversity.The concentration of persons from just one country for instance, > Neither is not safe for the Democratic organization. (Imagine if the two > Mexico and Brazil big country clubs decide to make a strong movement to > take > over this group, can be all the control positions) really not safe. Must > Have diversity. > > > > > 8) The alternate or deputy can assume the ALAC rep in case of Any > Inability of the primary ALAC rep > > > I Believe This Shall be submitted to ALAC, We can not decide the next time > member sat to ALAC meeting is another > > > > > 9) the ALAC member can be re-Elected for a two year term 2nd > > > Reelection has the Same Principle 1 year for second term to allow Others > to > Participate. > > > > > 10) creation of a LACRALO LACRALO Directory Board with administrative or > and operative functions. This will Comprise the persons Elected in LACRALO > (President, Vice-President, Secretary, Deputy Secretary, the two LACRALO > Elected Representatives and Their alternates to ALAC) and five Policy > Directors who would lead Different working groups within The LACRALO and > in > Selecting members within The charge of Their working groups.Policy > Directors > would be Elected by the General Assembly by simple Majority. > > > > > > > In my opinion This Will mean too much and not generals to command Troops > Impact but no at all. > > > 3 would be good one member of Caribbean region and two from Latin > region too keep at Same Time diversity and be reasonable (there is no > members that really works much in so I dont LACRALO believe it will be > enough groups to work under 5 policy directors). But not so relevant > > > > > 11) Establishing elections can take place That Virtually > > > This is good, but needs clear tools available to Avoid Must be one member > to vote for all the ALS under ITS command - Allow This only after > check the security of the tool. > > > > > 12) Amendments would be applicable to Existing mandates of President, > Secretary > > > I am not in behalf of That, only if WAS To Have Just One More year term. > > > Application of the change in benefice of the Existing Elected members > looks > manipulation. > > > Same people can be candidate and be Elected, But Extending the mandate, > looks not Democratic. Thats the way ditactors use to keeping in place > Totally Against. > > > > > 13) The constitution of the Board of LACRALO be Held after the first > Immediately election to be Held at the time of These Amendments be > approved. > > > Not so relevant. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Vanda Scartezini > > > Acesse: http://nomcom.icann.org and candidate-it! > > > Access: http://nomcom.icann.org and apply! > > > Polo Consulting Associates > > > IT Trend > > > Alameda Santos 1470 conj. 1407 > > > 01418-903 So Paulo, SP, Brazil > > > Tel + 5511 3266.6253 > > > Mob + 55118181.1464 > > > Dissemine this idia: > > > Enter or domain ao telefone do research. > > > Domain dialing > > > Descrio: Descrio: Siter-16-square.png <http://www.siter.com> > www.siter.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [[--Original text (es) > http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/e362689255.html > --]] > > > _______________________________________________ > lac-discuss-en mailing list > lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-en >

2 2

RES: mis comentarios relacionados con la Enmienda
by vanda＠uol.com.br March 4, 2012

March 4, 2012

[[--Translated text (en -> es)--]] Asunto: RES: mis comentarios relacionados con la Enmienda De: vanda(a)uol.com.br Bueno, mis comentarios en que se basa en la suposición de que todos los miembros del GT estaban al tanto de la propuesta, y de acuerdo con ella. Si no hay ningún acuerdo de este tipo interno que mejor poner sobre la mesa todas las demás propuestas también, al menos, para ser justos, pero sobre todo para seguir la bajo los principios de la ICANN. Cintra, su propuesta de invitar a la opinión de la A Regional de Grandes Equipo de Coordinación, se ve muy positivo en mi opinión y animo el grupo de trabajo, que incluyen a hacerlo! Best y Abrazos a tout ----- Mensagem original ----- De: lac-discuss-es-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org [Mailto: lac-discuss-es-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org] Em nome de Cintra Sooknanan Enviada em: Domingo, 4 de maro de 2012 11:19 Para: lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org Cc: Heidi Ullrich, de la ICANN At-Large Personal; lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org~~V Assunto: Re: [lac-discuss-es] [lac-discuss-es] mis comentarios relacionados con la ENMIENDA Saludos LACRALO, Luego de la revisión de las propuestas debo expresar mi descontento con la redacción que totalmente no tiene en cuenta las propuestas formuladas por el Caribe ALS, tanto en público en la lista y las llamadas, e internamente a la modificación de la Ley de Trabajo por Grupo. El hecho de que nuestro punto de vista no fue capturado en el presente documento demuestra claramente que el redactor no fue objetivo y sólo optó por representan las propuestas de sí misma y un segmento de la LACRALO. Â¿Fue esta acciÃ³n la intenciÃ³n de la fracciÃ³n nuestras relaciones y dejar de lado mi sub-regiÃ³n de mÃ¡s allÃ¡, o es simplemente una cuestiÃ³n de ignorancia por parte del escritor? Les pido que considerar la respuesta. Esta visiÃ³n propuesta para la nueva lacralo es un error administrativo. Es pesada arriba, no tiene en cuenta la diversidad, usurpa el papel de ALAC y de ICANN, no tiene mecanismos para fomentar la participaciÃ³n y muestra una clara falta de la comprensiÃ³n de la responsabilidad de los miembros electos. Me siento satisfecho por La contribuciÃ³n de Vanda y la esperanza de que esta sabidurÃa serÃ¡ escuchado.Yo tambiÃ©n desea hacer una peticiÃ³n formal para que para seguir adelante con las medidas estructurales LACRALO cambios que buscan consejos de nuestras Al Regional de Grandes Equipo de CoordinaciÃ³n, que estÃ¡n bien con experiencia y conocimientos en esta Ã¡rea, despuÃ©s de haber supervisado los cambios estructurales en Ralos otros. A modo de antecedentes que he estado en este grupo de trabajo ya que el Cartagena reuniÃ³n en 2010 y esta es la primera vez que se ha producido ninguna indicaciÃ³n de la formaciÃ³n de un consejo de administraciÃ³n. Es alarmante para mÃ que ha sido poner a lacralo sin ningÃºn tipo de discusiÃ³n y representado como el trabajo de la Al ModificaciÃ³n de la Ley del Grupo de Trabajo. De hecho, mientras que yo estoy de acuerdo con Puntos de Vanda, yo difiero de la opiniÃ³n en su punto 10), que se refiere a la Lacralo Junta Directorio. Solicito que el autor de estas propuestas para explicar El razonamiento detrÃ¡s de la Junta de Directorio de LACRALO y con carÃ¡cter de urgencia para salvar su reputaciÃ³n mediante el envÃo de un proyecto revisado de propuestas que captura todas las enmiendas propuestas por la Ley de ModificaciÃ³n por Trabajo Grupo. Gracias Cintra Sooknanan El sÃ¡bado, 03 de marzo 2012 a las 6:39 PM, <vanda(a)uol.com.br> escribiÃ³: > > [[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] > > Subject: my comments related the ammendment > From: vanda(a)uol.com.br > > Here my analysis to share with you all related to the Proposal > Amendments. I am not sure my due if I commit with NOMCOMM will will > be Able to Participate in all sessions, so I Decided to share my > opinions are With All of you. > > > Point I have something to say in highlight below. > > > Thanks > > > VANDA > > > > > Points Proposed by one group > > > My comments > > > > > 1) the right to vote in ALSes of affairs LACRALO Determined by a > minimum level of participation > > > This is positive > > > > > 2) working languages \u200b\u200bFrench and Portuguese expanded to > > > I dont see need and may be too expensive. But this is not a main > concern '. > (But I dont see APRALO working in the more than 20 languages > \u200b\u200bThey Have there > > > > > 3) Removes the concept of operating by consensus > From my point of > view this is one of ICANNs Principle Against build consensus > > > > > 4) creation of Vice President > > > Those persons can not be added to the normal representation without > at ALAC the decision of ALAC itself. Not for LACRALO to decide. See > also below on item 8 > > > > > 5) terms of President and Vice President for two terms of eligible 2 > Each years > > > This make some sense, since representation in ALAC Demands Some > degree of learning, so one year is short term indeed. But the second > term Shall Be one year to allow Others to Participate. > > > > > 6) creation position of Vice Secretariat > > > Same vice president of > > > > > 7) LACRALO would serve to elect 2 persons and 2 Others on ALAC as > Their > > > respective alternates (diversity not apply to Marshall Requirements > Elected ALAC member and Their alternate). > > > I disagree - diversity Shall apply. The Principles of ICANN states on > diversity.The concentration of persons from just one country for > instance, Neither is not safe for the Democratic organization. > (Imagine if the two Mexico and Brazil big country clubs decide to > make a strong movement to take over this group, can be all the > control positions) really not safe. Must Have diversity. > > > > > 8) The alternate or deputy can assume the ALAC rep in case of Any > Inability of the primary ALAC rep > > > I Believe This Shall be submitted to ALAC, We can not decide the next > time member sat to ALAC meeting is another > > > > > 9) the ALAC member can be re-Elected for a two year term 2nd > > > Reelection has the Same Principle 1 year for second term to allow > Others to Participate. > > > > > 10) creation of a LACRALO LACRALO Directory Board with administrative > or and operative functions. This will Comprise the persons Elected in > LACRALO (President, Vice-President, Secretary, Deputy Secretary, the > two LACRALO Elected Representatives and Their alternates to ALAC) and > five Policy Directors who would lead Different working groups within > The LACRALO and in Selecting members within The charge of Their > working groups.Policy Directors would be Elected by the General > Assembly by simple Majority. > > > > > > > In my opinion This Will mean too much and not generals to command > Troops Impact but no at all. > > > 3 would be good one member of Caribbean region and two from Latin > region too keep at Same Time diversity and be reasonable (there is no > members that really works much in so I dont LACRALO believe it will be > enough groups to work under 5 policy directors). But not so relevant > > > > > 11) Establishing elections can take place That Virtually > > > This is good, but needs clear tools available to Avoid Must be one > member to vote for all the ALS under ITS command - Allow This only > after check the security of the tool. > > > > > 12) Amendments would be applicable to Existing mandates of President, > Secretary > > > I am not in behalf of That, only if WAS To Have Just One More year term. > > > Application of the change in benefice of the Existing Elected members > looks manipulation. > > > Same people can be candidate and be Elected, But Extending the > mandate, looks not Democratic. Thats the way ditactors use to keeping > in place Totally Against. > > > > > 13) The constitution of the Board of LACRALO be Held after the first > Immediately election to be Held at the time of These Amendments be > approved. > > > Not so relevant. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Vanda Scartezini > > > Acesse: http://nomcom.icann.org and candidate-it! > > > Access: http://nomcom.icann.org and apply! > > > Polo Consulting Associates > > > IT Trend > > > Alameda Santos 1470 conj. 1407 > > > 01418-903 So Paulo, SP, Brazil > > > Tel + 5511 3266.6253 > > > Mob + 55118181.1464 > > > Dissemine this idia: > > > Enter or domain ao telefone do research. > > > Domain dialing > > > Descrio: Descrio: Siter-16-square.png <http://www.siter.com> > www.siter.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [[--Original text (en) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/4994db91b7.html --]]

1 0

Re: [lac-discuss-es] mis comentarios relacionados con la Enmienda
by cintra.sooknanan＠gmail.com March 4, 2012

March 4, 2012

[[--Translated text (en -> es)--]] Asunto: Re: mis comentarios relacionados con la Enmienda De: cintra.sooknanan(a)gmail.com Saludos LACRALO, Luego de la revisión de las propuestas debo expresar mi descontento con la de redacción que no tiene en cuenta totalmente las propuestas hechas por el Caribe ALS tanto en público como en la lista y las llamadas, e internamente a la por la Ley Modificación del Grupo de Trabajo. El hecho de que nuestro punto de vista no era capturado en el presente documento demuestra claramente que el redactor no era objetivo y sólo eligió para representar a las propuestas de sí misma y un segmento de LACRALO. Fue esta acción la intención de la fracción nuestras relaciones y dejar de lado mi sub-región de más, o es simplemente una cuestión de ignorancia por parte del escritor? Les pido que piense la respuesta. Esta visión propuesta para la nueva lacralo es un error administrativo. Es pesada arriba, no tiene en cuenta la diversidad, usurpa el papel de ALAC y de ICANN, no tiene mecanismos para fomentar la participación y muestra una clara falta de la comprensión de la responsabilidad de los miembros electos.Me siento satisfecho por La contribución de Vanda y la esperanza de que esta sabiduría será escuchado. Yo también desea hacer una petición formal para que para seguir adelante con las medidas estructurales LACRALO cambios que buscan consejos de nuestras Al Regional de Grandes Equipo de Coordinación, que están bien con experiencia y conocimientos en esta área, después de haber supervisado los cambios estructurales en Ralos otros. A modo de antecedentes que he estado en este grupo de trabajo ya que el Cartagena reunión en 2010 y esta es la primera vez que se ha producido ninguna indicaciÃ³n de la formaciÃ³n de un consejo de administraciÃ³n. Es alarmante para mÃ que tiene ha puesto a lacralo sin ningÃºn tipo de discusiÃ³n y representado como el trabajo de Por el Grupo de ModificaciÃ³n de la Ley de Trabajo. De hecho, mientras que yo estoy de acuerdo con puntos de Vanda, yo difiero de la opiniÃ³n en su punto 10), que se refiere a la Junta de Directorio de LACRALO. Solicito que el autor de estas propuestas para explicar el razonamiento detrÃ¡s de la Junta de Directorio de LACRALO y como una cuestiÃ³n de urgencia de salvar su reputaciÃ³n mediante el envÃo de un proyecto revisado de propuestas que recoge todas las enmiendas propuestas por la modificaciÃ³n de la Ley por Grupo de Trabajo. Gracias Cintra Sooknanan El sÃ¡bado, 03 de marzo 2012 a las 6:39 PM, <vanda(a)uol.com.br> escribiÃ³: > > [[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] > > Subject: my comments related the ammendment > From: vanda(a)uol.com.br > > Here my analysis to share with you all related to the Proposal > Amendments. I > am not sure my due if I commit with NOMCOMM will will be Able to > Participate > in all sessions, so I Decided to share my opinions are With All of you. > > > Point I have something to say in highlight below. > > > Thanks > > > VANDA > > > > > Points Proposed by one group > > > My comments > > > > > 1) the right to vote in ALSes of affairs LACRALO Determined by a > minimum level of participation > > > This is positive > > > > > 2) working languages \u200b\u200bFrench and Portuguese expanded to > > > I dont see need and may be too expensive. But this is not a main concern > '. > (But I dont see APRALO working in the more than 20 languages > \u200b\u200bThey Have > there > > > > > 3) Removes the concept of operating by consensus > > From my point of view this is one of ICANNs Principle Against build > consensus > > > > > 4) creation of Vice President > > > Those persons can not be added to the normal representation without at > ALAC > the decision of ALAC itself. Not for LACRALO to decide. See also below on > item 8 > > > > > 5) terms of President and Vice President for two terms of eligible 2 > Each years > > > This make some sense, since representation in ALAC Demands Some degree of > learning, so one year is short term indeed. But the second term Shall Be > one year to allow Others to Participate. > > > > > 6) creation position of Vice Secretariat > > > Same vice president of > > > > > 7) LACRALO would serve to elect 2 persons and 2 Others on ALAC as Their > > > respective alternates (diversity not apply to Marshall Requirements > Elected > ALAC member and Their alternate). > > > I disagree - diversity Shall apply. The Principles of ICANN states on > diversity.The concentration of persons from just one country for instance, > Neither is not safe for the Democratic organization. (Imagine if the two > Mexico and Brazil big country clubs decide to make a strong movement to > take > over this group, can be all the control positions) really not safe. Must > Have diversity. > > > > > 8) The alternate or deputy can assume the ALAC rep in case of Any > Inability of the primary ALAC rep > > > I Believe This Shall be submitted to ALAC, We can not decide the next time > member sat to ALAC meeting is another > > > > > 9) the ALAC member can be re-Elected for a two year term 2nd > > > Reelection has the Same Principle 1 year for second term to allow Others > to > Participate. > > > > > 10) creation of a LACRALO LACRALO Directory Board with administrative or > and operative functions. This will Comprise the persons Elected in LACRALO > (President, Vice-President, Secretary, Deputy Secretary, the two LACRALO > Elected Representatives and Their alternates to ALAC) and five Policy > Directors who would lead Different working groups within The LACRALO and > in > Selecting members within The charge of Their working groups.Policy > Directors > would be Elected by the General Assembly by simple Majority. > > > > > > > In my opinion This Will mean too much and not generals to command Troops > Impact but no at all. > > > 3 would be good one member of Caribbean region and two from Latin > region too keep at Same Time diversity and be reasonable (there is no > members that really works much in so I dont LACRALO believe it will be > enough groups to work under 5 policy directors). But not so relevant > > > > > 11) Establishing elections can take place That Virtually > > > This is good, but needs clear tools available to Avoid Must be one member > to vote for all the ALS under ITS command - Allow This only after > check the security of the tool. > > > > > 12) Amendments would be applicable to Existing mandates of President, > Secretary > > > I am not in behalf of That, only if WAS To Have Just One More year term. > > > Application of the change in benefice of the Existing Elected members > looks > manipulation. > > > Same people can be candidate and be Elected, But Extending the mandate, > looks not Democratic. Thats the way ditactors use to keeping in place > Totally Against. > > > > > 13) The constitution of the Board of LACRALO be Held after the first > Immediately election to be Held at the time of These Amendments be > approved. > > > Not so relevant. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Vanda Scartezini > > > Acesse: http://nomcom.icann.org and candidate-it! > > > Access: http://nomcom.icann.org and apply! > > > Polo Consulting Associates > > > IT Trend > > > Alameda Santos 1470 conj. 1407 > > > 01418-903 So Paulo, SP, Brazil > > > Tel + 5511 3266.6253 > > > Mob + 55118181.1464 > > > Dissemine this idia: > > > Enter or domain ao telefone do research. > > > Domain dialing > > > Descrio: Descrio: Siter-16-square.png <http://www.siter.com> > www.siter.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [[--Original text (en) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/bba752fd1f.html --]]

1 0

Re Pr�ximos pasos: elecci�n del Presidente y la Secretar�a de LACRALO en el GA en Costa Rica
by devtee＠gmail.com March 3, 2012

March 3, 2012

[[--Translated text (en -> es)--]] Asunto: Re Próximos pasos: elección del Presidente y la Secretaría de LACRALO en el GA en Costa Rica De: devtee(a)gmail.com Queridos todos, ALS Varios han expresado su apoyo para la elección de la LACRALO Presidente y la Secretaría para ser incluido en la agenda de la Asamblea General en Costa Rica. Sin embargo, teniendo en cuenta la Regla 13 de las Reglas de Procedimiento ( https://community.icann.org/x/eQUt 13.1 La Secretaría preguntará a todos los ALS acreditadas si tienen la intención presentarse a las elecciones en la Asamblea General al menos dos meses antes de la apertura de la Asamblea General. Candidatura debe ser declarado y presentado ante la Secretaría por lo menos cuatro semanas antes de la apertura de la La Asamblea General. 13.2 Por lo menos cuatro semanas antes de la apertura de la Asamblea General La Secretaría enviará a todos los representantes acreditados de la lista de la ELA y sus candidatos. La lista de candidaturas podrá ser revisado si es necesario, sin perjuicio de otras reglas de calificación que pueden ser adoptadas por la Asamblea General. 13.3 La lista de candidaturas se cerrará y se cierra, al menos 48 horas antes de la apertura de la Asamblea General. Así el artículo 13 es específico con respecto a la elección de LACRALO representantes que se requiere un aviso de dos meses antes de cualquier LACRALO Asamblea convocada para elegir a los representantes de LACRALO. Teniendo en cuenta que el término de un año del Presidente y la Secretaría termina el 14 de abril 2012, la convocatoria de candidaturas debe haber comenzado antes a mediados de febrero de 2012 en la lista de distribuciÃ³n LACRALO, pero con la planificaciÃ³n de los acontecimientos LACRALO en Costa Rica, esta llamada no se hizo. Por lo tanto, la SecretarÃa han determinado que, para que el las elecciones que se produzcan en la Asamblea General en Costa Rica, es necesario que: - La convocatoria de candidaturas para los cargos de presidente y LACRALO LACRALO secretarÃa comenzarÃ¡ el 3 de marzo de 2012. - Si una ALS desea llevar a cabo la elecciÃ³n del Presidente de LACRALO y la SecretarÃa durante la Asamblea General en Costa Rica, dos movimientos son OBLIGATORIOS la suspensiÃ³n de la ROP y permitir que tal elecciÃ³n: 1.Una mociÃ³n para suspender el artÃculo 13.1 de la duraciÃ³n de la Asamblea General deberÃ¡ ser preparado y presentado a la SecretarÃa por cualquier ELA antes de 05 de marzo 2012 para su consideraciÃ³n por la Asamblea General de LACRALO. 2. Una mociÃ³n para suspender el artÃculo 13.2 de la duraciÃ³n de la Asamblea General deberÃ¡ ser preparado y presentado a la SecretarÃa por cualquier ELA antes de 05 de marzo 2012 para su consideraciÃ³n por la Asamblea General de LACRALO. Ambas mociones deben ser consideradas y aprobadas por la Asamblea General para cualquier las elecciones que se produzca. Un fracaso de la mociÃ³n de suspensiÃ³n de la regla 13.1 significa automÃ¡tica fracaso de la mociÃ³n de suspender la Regla 13.2. El tiempo estimado para que examine las posibles propuestas y tener la elecciÃ³n del Presidente y la SecretarÃa es de 2 1/2 a 3 horas. Tenga en cuenta que con un movimiento no suspender el ArtÃculo 13.3, los nombres deben ser cerrarÃ¡ 48 horas antes de la Asamblea General. Saludos cordiales, Dev Anand Teelucksingh LACRALO SecretarÃa _______________________________________________ [[--Original text (en) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/f5fc8d1634.html --]]

5 4