Statement of Work - Technical Writer
Dear all… Further to discussions in Dublin and at today’s call, please find below a link to a Statement of Work. Our plans going forward: To get comments on this by End of Day Tuesday. To issue final document by Wednesday and invite responses within seven days. We’ll then evaluate the responses and make a decision as soon as possible. https://docs.google.com/document/d/1c7LctCUii337oJK5lj2utAgNxWIq0ncotFKikljk... <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1c7LctCUii337oJK5lj2utAgNxWIq0ncotFKikljk...> Summary: Please review this statement of work (if you’re interested) and provide any comments. Alert people in your own networks that this work will be coming available around the middle of the month. (We’ll post it on the UA Wiki and distribute it through the UA-Discuss list - and encourage others to share with your own networks. Thank you. Don
I would change the phrase "Statement of Work" to "Document for Recruitment", as there is nothing in the original phrase which implies there is work that needs to be done in the future. Ron
I think “statement of work” is a standard term for any contracted task, whether one-time or ongoing. From: ua-discuss-bounces@icann.org [mailto:ua-discuss-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Ron Baione via UA-discuss Sent: Wednesday, November 4, 2015 6:18 PM To: UA-discuss@icann.org Subject: Re: [UA-discuss] Statement of Work - Technical Writer I would change the phrase "Statement of Work" to "Document for Recruitment", as there is nothing in the original phrase which implies there is work that needs to be done in the future. Ron ________________________________ From: Don Hollander <don.hollander@icann.org<mailto:don.hollander@icann.org>>; To: UA-discuss@icann.org<mailto:UA-discuss@icann.org> <UA-discuss@icann.org<mailto:UA-discuss@icann.org>>; Subject: [UA-discuss] Statement of Work - Technical Writer Sent: Thu, Nov 5, 2015 12:15:45 AM Dear all… Further to discussions in Dublin and at today’s call, please find below a link to a Statement of Work. Our plans going forward: To get comments on this by End of Day Tuesday. To issue final document by Wednesday and invite responses within seven days. We’ll then evaluate the responses and make a decision as soon as possible. https://docs.google.com/document/d/1c7LctCUii337oJK5lj2utAgNxWIq0ncotFKikljkm7E/edit<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3a%2f%2fdocs.google.com%2fdocument%2fd%2f1c7LctCUii337oJK5lj2utAgNxWIq0ncotFKikljkm7E%2fedit&data=01%7c01%7cmarksv%40microsoft.com%7c3c9054e0210548cd473308d2e589df19%7c72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7c1&sdata=CXuhW7agLmJ2ciFdTKvow5zdZe1E%2fUaJxoiNTlkV6eE%3d> Summary: Please review this statement of work (if you’re interested) and provide any comments. Alert people in your own networks that this work will be coming available around the middle of the month. (We’ll post it on the UA Wiki and distribute it through the UA-Discuss list - and encourage others to share with your own networks. Thank you. Don
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Statement_of_work Correct, Statement of Work or SOW is a standard, yet vague and poorly thought out term, thought out bu and used by the current U.S. Oligarchy in its contract procurements. Par for the course for an oligarchy that recently spent 43 million dollars on a gas station and gives bonuses and promotions to federal employees who defecate in the hallways of their work premises. ICANN should break from its use of the SOW term to one which reflects relevance and intellectual clarity, two concepts oligarchies traditionally oppose in their use of language terms and phrases. In fact, historical study suggests that one common goal of all oligarchies has been to manipulate language for its own benefit: unending power via perpetual war. Let's instead use a more humane phrase, "Document For Recruitment" or "Job Posting Description". There is no reason why any group within ICANN should feel compelled to adhere to the language mistakes of any oligarchy, let alone the daily embarassment that is this U.S. Oligarchy, especially when this Oligarchy is transitioning its responsibilities to ICANN in the near term, hopefully by next Sepetember. ICANN should be confident enough therefore to present its choice of language and symbols which at all times reflect the greatest relevance to the specific task, clarity and respect for human rights at all times. Ron
I didn't log into google, but I just put a bunch of suggested edits and some comments into the draft. A On Thu, Nov 05, 2015 at 12:15:45AM +0000, Don Hollander wrote:
Dear all…
Further to discussions in Dublin and at today’s call, please find below a link to a Statement of Work.
Our plans going forward:
To get comments on this by End of Day Tuesday.
To issue final document by Wednesday and invite responses within seven days.
We’ll then evaluate the responses and make a decision as soon as possible.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1c7LctCUii337oJK5lj2utAgNxWIq0ncotFKikljk... <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1c7LctCUii337oJK5lj2utAgNxWIq0ncotFKikljk...>
Summary:
Please review this statement of work (if you’re interested) and provide any comments. Alert people in your own networks that this work will be coming available around the middle of the month. (We’ll post it on the UA Wiki and distribute it through the UA-Discuss list - and encourage others to share with your own networks.
Thank you.
Don
-- Andrew Sullivan ajs@anvilwalrusden.com
participants (4)
-
Andrew Sullivan -
Don Hollander -
Mark Svancarek -
Ron Baione