Asmus:

This is interesting! Could you please give a link to the proposal — a document number, a URL, a link to an email thread?

From what I have seen of software developers wanting to stick with IDNA 2003 instead of moving to IDNA 2008, the declarations of UTS #46 do not seem to be a major factor. UTS #46 talks of a transition, but I don't hear developers talking about being mid-transition. The use using IDNA 2003 seem to want to stay with IDNA 2003 until some other factor — like a library, or a more important piece of software in their ecosystem — changes to adopt IDNA 2008.

Best regards,
    —Jim DeLaHunt

On 2023-02-23 14:16, Asmus Freytag via UA-discuss wrote:

Just a heads up for whoever is interested:

There is a proposal in the works in the Unicode Consortium to deprecate the "deviation" mappings in UTS#46 and to declare the transitional period to be over. This recognizes the fact that some registries are no longer compatible with the deviation mappings and some browsers have stopped supporting them.

Four characters are affected, including ß and final sigma.

A./


_______________________________________________
UA-discuss mailing list
UA-discuss@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ua-discuss
_______________________________________________
By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
-- 
.   --Jim DeLaHunt, jdlh@jdlh.com     http://blog.jdlh.com/ (http://jdlh.com/)
      multilingual websites consultant