Thanks.

How’s this?

Document Number (e.g. UASG000) – this will be maintained as a consistent reference name for a document. NB: No hyphen in the document number.
Document Short Title (e.g. UASG000 Inventory of Material) – this will be included in the file name.
Document Language (e.g. UASG000 Inventory of Material EN) – this will be included in the file name.
Document Revision – (e.g. UASG000 Inventory of Material EN 2019-01-25) This will be based on the publication date and represented in the file name as yyyy-mm-dd. It will also be included within the document.
Document Link – (e.g. https://uasg.tech/documents/UASG000-Inventory-of-Material EN 2019 01 25.pdf ) This will be based on the language of the document and is what’s published on the UASG.Tech website and will retrieve the latest official version of the document.
Archives: The UASG.tech website will include a repository of deprecated versions of documents that will be stored and displayed based on its file name (which will include the published date)
Revision Details: For most documents we will maintain a table at the end showing a summary of revisions. Where a document is used a brochure, this will not be done.

Revision Notes:

2019-01-25	Added Document Naming and Storage Conventions
2018-12-25	Added expected review dates

From: UA-discuss <ua-discuss-bounces@icann.org> On Behalf Of Tex
Sent: Friday, 25 January 2019 1:23 PM
To: 'Asmus Freytag' <asmusf@ix.netcom.com>; ua-discuss@icann.org
Subject: Re: [UA-discuss] Proposal: Handling Numbering of the UASG Documents

Thanks for the clarification Asmus. I agree with you, brochures shouldn’t have revision histories.

I had noticed the one place where Jim used the word “reservation” and thought your second sentence was independent from the first, and commenting on that-

“I have reservations about embedding text like "wp-content/uploads/" in the official document link”

So it’s all good.

Tex

From: UA-discuss [mailto:ua-discuss-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Asmus Freytag
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2019 4:10 PM
To: ua-discuss@icann.org
Subject: Re: [UA-discuss] Proposal: Handling Numbering of the UASG Documents

On 1/24/2019 2:55 PM, Tex wrote:

PS: Brochures, by their nature are different from the kind of reports and formal documents that need careful version tracking in the document. I disagree with Jim on his reservation.

This was about whether revisions are documented inside the document. Don, suggested not, and I would agree. I think of brochures as a type of document, not a technology, but may have misunderstood something.

A./