Hello, everyone:
May I suggest that we accept all six volunteers to the position, and do away with a vote? I know that I could use the help, and I also know that corralling the energies of these six individuals, all of whom who have already participated and made material contributions to the UA initiative, will be a worthwhile enterprise.
First, I don't know enough about the structure of UASG, and the role of vice-chair, to know whether it is better to have three vice-chairs or six. I have no comment.
However, I think it is a good thing for any organisation if it
can find ways to "corral the energies" of willing volunteers
without requiring them to hold a formal position. Put the other
way, it is a good thing if the organisation doesn't expect that
only those with formal positions will do the work of the
organisation. And, some responsibilities have to fall on a small
number of people, they cannot be delegated without limit.
Second, if there is to be an election, there are a variety of rules for running elections. This is something I am quite interested in. For a group like this, my belief is that Preferential ballots, counted by a Single Transferable Vote method would be a good choice for electing three vice-chairs from more candidates. (To elect only one chair, the related Preferential ballots, counted by an Instant Runoff Voting method works well.)
Are there any bylaws for the running of this group? There is a UASG charter, which says this:
Again, my thanks to everyone who has stepped forward to provide leadership.The Steering Group itself will be overseen by one Chair and two to three Vice-Chairs who will be appointed to two-year terms with the possibility of one reappointment so that Chairs and Vice-Chairs will serve for a period of no less than two years and no more than four. The goal of the Steering Group is primarily to oversee and participate in the work of the UASG. The Steering Group will also lead the budget process, maintain the Charter, and coordinate the creation and dissolution of Projects.
If you agree with my proposal (or have a different point of view), please post back to the list. If we can hear some consensus on my proposed approach, then we’ll take the administrative steps to having 6 vice-chairs ratified.
Regards,
Ram
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ram Mohan
o: +1.215.706.5700 x103; m: +1.215.431.0958; f: +1.215.706.5701
Skype:gliderpilot30 |@rmohan123|www.linkedin.com/in/rmohan
From: Don Hollander [mailto:don.hollander@icann.org]
Sent: Thursday, February 23, 2017 1:45 PM
To: ua-discuss <UA-discuss@icann.org>
Subject: [UA-discuss] Election update...
A quick update on the election process:
There was one accepted nomination for Chair: Ram Mohan. So, Ram continues in the role for another two years. Congratulations.
There were six accepted nominations for the three positions of Vice-Chair:
Vice-Chair - Edmon Chung
Vice-Chair - Ajay Data
Vice-Chair - Christian Dawson
Vice-Chair - Jothan Frakes
Vice-Chair - Rich Merdinger
Vice-Chair - Mark Svancarek
I am currently gathering materials from the candidates. Should be done in the next day.
Then, I’ll send a link to voting to all subscribers of this UA discuss list (as of the beginning of this week)
Voting will be available for a week and then we should have a decision.
Don
Don Hollander
Universal Acceptance Steering Group
Skype: don_hollander
--
--Jim DeLaHunt, jdlh@jdlh.com http://blog.jdlh.com/ (http://jdlh.com/)
multilingual websites consultant
157-2906 West Broadway, Vancouver BC V6K 2G8, Canada
Canada mobile +1-604-376-8953