Not directly related, but since reputation comes into play:
--
Mr Michele Neylon
Blacknight Solutions
Hosting, Colocation & Domains
https://www.blacknight.com
https://blacknight.blog /
http://ceo.hosting/
Intl. +353 (0) 59 9183072
Direct Dial: +353 (0)59 9183090
-------------------------------
Blacknight Internet Solutions Ltd, Unit 12A,Barrowside Business Park,Sleaty
Road,Graiguecullen,Carlow,
R93 X265
,Ireland Company No.: 370845
From: UA-discuss <ua-discuss-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of Elaine Pruis <elainepruis@gmail.com>
Date: Thursday 2 August 2018 at 19:50
To: John Levine <john.levine@standcore.com>
Cc: "UA-discuss@icann.org" <ua-discuss@icann.org>
Subject: Re: [UA-discuss] Email from new domains going to Junk (was: Requesting a contact from outlook/hotmail)
Thanks for sharing this Mark. Very interesting to see how new TLDs are treated.
On Thu, Aug 2, 2018 at 11:13 AM John Levine <john.levine@standcore.com> wrote:
In article <BN6PR21MB01305DAB5A84CBC7A57B09ACD12C0@BN6PR21MB0130.namprd21.prod.outlook.com> you write:
>Regarding the newer TLDs, the % legitimate traffic registering them is microscopic. I’ve been told by a spammer that periodically domains in these
>TLDs are available for sale in bulk for cents and therefore very much loved by spammers (.bid, .club as well).
This is the main point. I don't know anyone who's blocking new TLDs
just for being new, other than a few hobbyists. But if you think
about it for a few minutes, the only people who want bulk TLDs are
crooks, for spam or for phish and malware landing pages. It is
entirely reasonable to block an otherwise little used TLD if you see a
spike of abuse from it.
R's,
John