[PROPOSED] update tz-link for AMA and SRS
* tz-link.html: Also cite the American Medical Association and the Sleep Research Society in “Costs and benefits of time shifts”. Fix citation to the American Academy of Sleep Medicine. --- tz-link.html | 13 +++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/tz-link.html b/tz-link.html index 43190dd7..19740b11 100644 --- a/tz-link.html +++ b/tz-link.html @@ -973,6 +973,9 @@ zone shifts, and many scientific studies have been conducted. This section summarizes reviews and position statements based on scientific literature in the area.</p> <ul> +<li>In 2022 the American Medical Association issued a +<a href="https://www.ama-assn.org/press-center/press-releases/ama-calls-permanent-standard-time">statement +supporting permanent standard time</a> on health grounds.</li> <li>Carey RN, Sarma KM. <a href="https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/7/6/e014319.long">Impact of daylight saving time on road traffic collision risk: a systematic @@ -989,11 +992,17 @@ doi:<a href="https://doi.org/10.5547/01956574.39.2.thav">10.5547/01956574.39.2.t This analyzes research literature and concludes, "Electricity savings are larger for countries farther away from the equator, while subtropical regions consume more electricity because of <abbr>DST</abbr>."</li> +<li>Malow BA. It is time to abolish the clock change and adopt permanent +standard time in the United States: a Sleep Research Society position statement. +<em>Sleep</em>. 2022;45(12):zsac236. +doi:<a href="https://doi.org/10.1093/sleep/zsac236">10.1093/sleep/zsac236</a>. +After reviewing of the scientific literature, the Sleep Research Society +advocates permanent standard time due to its health benefits. <li>Rishi MA, Ahmed O, Barrantes Perez JH <em>et al</em>. <a href="https://jcsm.aasm.org/doi/10.5664/jcsm.8780">Daylight saving time: an American Academy of Sleep Medicine position statement</a>. -<em>J Clin Sleep Med.</em> -2020;<a href="https://doi.org/10.5664/jcsm.8780">10.5664/jcsm.8780</a>. +<em>J Clin Sleep Med.</em> 2020;16(10):1781–1784. +doi:<a href="https://doi.org/10.5664/jcsm.8780">10.5664/jcsm.8780</a>. This argues for permanent standard time due to health risks of both <abbr>DST</abbr> transitions and permanent <abbr>DST</abbr>.</li> <li>Roenneberg T, Wirz-Justice A, Skene DJ <em>et al</em>. -- 2.39.2
participants (1)
-
Paul Eggert