Re: 64-bit time_t must go--this is non-negotiable
matthew green <mrg@eterna.com.au> writes:
actually, no NetBSD platform uses a 64 bit time_t on any of the several 64 bit machines it runs on.
Sorry, my mistake. Thanks for correcting me. I was told in 1995 that NetBSD on Alpha used a 64-bit time_t, and never bothered to check (nor has anyone else corrected me despite my reporting this on Usenet for almost a decade, e.g., see <http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=51ke97%2452d%40deck.twinsun.com>). I just checked Usenet, and FreeBSD started talking about the change to 64-bit time_t in 2001 and decided to do it one architecture at a time (sparc64 made the transition earlier this year). They're even making noises about using 64-bit time_t for x86, though that sounds a bit extreme. So I should have written "FreeBSD on some architectures" rather than "the BSDs".
<<On Thu, 17 Jun 2004 21:54:39 -0700, Paul Eggert <eggert@CS.UCLA.EDU> said:
I just checked Usenet, and FreeBSD started talking about the change to 64-bit time_t in 2001 and decided to do it one architecture at a time (sparc64 made the transition earlier this year). They're even making noises about using 64-bit time_t for x86, though that sounds a bit extreme.
I expect to see this in all tier-1 architectures in FreeBSD 6. All 64-bit architectures except Alpha, which is moribund, have it now. -GAWollman
participants (2)
-
Garrett Wollman -
Paul Eggert