From @doc.memex.co.uk:peter@memex.co.uk Tue Mar 29 08:03:37 1994 Return-Path: <@doc.memex.co.uk:peter@memex.co.uk> Received: from relay2.UU.NET by elsie.nci.nih.gov (4.1/SMI-4.1) id AA09181; Tue, 29 Mar 94 08:03:34 EST Received: from young.cs.strath.ac.uk by relay2.UU.NET with SMTP (5.61/UUNET-internet-primary) id AAwjia29244; Tue, 29 Mar 94 08:03:28 -0500 Received: from doc.memex.co.uk by young.cs.strath.ac.uk id aa02542; 29 Mar 94 14:02 +0100 Received: by doc.memex.co.uk (4.1/memex_18) id AA15065; Tue, 29 Mar 94 13:51:13 BST Date: Tue, 29 Mar 94 13:51:13 BST From: Peter Ilieve <peter@memex.co.uk> Message-Id: <9403291251.AA15065@doc.memex.co.uk> To: ado@elsie.nci.nih.gov Subject: Re: EU Summer Time update Status: RO

...

Thanks for the scoop on EU Summer Time. Is it premature to forward it to the time zone list?

...

It is the best info available at present. My personal guess is that nothing will be changed. I have no idea why it has taken since last September to fail to confirm this directive, nor why it may take until May. The first change from existing practice is not until October 95, when the UK/Eire date is Sun>=22 rather than Sun>=23 so it is probably safe to pass it on, even if you have to correct it later.

Peter