Bulletin C 43 came out yesterday, scheduling a leap second for the end of June 2012. Patch attached. -zefram
Thanks - I have already included bulletin C 43 in the leapseconds file, it will be in the diff for the next release when I send it (sometime very soon...) kre
On 06/01/12 11:54, Zefram wrote:
Bulletin C 43 came out yesterday, scheduling a leap second for the end of June 2012. Patch attached. -zefram --- leapseconds 2012-01-06 10:47:32.000000000 +0000 +++ leapseconds.new 2012-01-06 10:49:42.000000000 +0000 @@ -48,40 +48,53 @@ Leap 1998 Dec 31 23:59:60 + S Leap 2005 Dec 31 23:59:60 + S Leap 2008 Dec 31 23:59:60 + S +Leap 2012 Jun 30 23:59:60 + S
-# INTERNATIONAL EARTH ROTATION AND REFERENCE SYSTEMS SERVICE (IERS) +# INTERNATIONAL EARTH ROTATION AND REFERENCE SYSTEMS SERVICE (IERS) # # SERVICE INTERNATIONAL DE LA ROTATION TERRESTRE ET DES SYSTEMES DE REFERENCE # # SERVICE DE LA ROTATION TERRESTRE # OBSERVATOIRE DE PARIS # 61, Av. de l'Observatoire 75014 PARIS (France) -# Tel. : 33 (0) 1 40 51 22 29 +# Tel. : 33 (0) 1 40 51 22 26 # FAX : 33 (0) 1 40 51 22 91 -# Internet :services.iers@obspm.fr +# e-mail :services.iers@obspm.fr +#http://hpiers.obspm.fr/eop-pc Is the change of telephone number intentional? The number stated in http://hpiers.obspm.fr/eop-pc/ is 00 33 (0)1 40 51 22 29 (the old one).
Date: Fri, 06 Jan 2012 18:31:41 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=C1ngel_Gonz=E1lez?= <keisial@gmail.com> Message-ID: <4F072FFD.4000603@gmail.com> | Is the change of telephone number intentional? The last couple of bulletins have said ...26 - I think we need to believe what they're sending out. If that's incorrect, some later version will fix it (and it isn't as if anyone is going to really go searching in the tzdata leapseconds file comments in order to find out how to contact IERS). kre
The new text in Zefram's diff is directly from Bulletin C 43<ftp://hpiers.obspm.fr/iers/bul/bulc/bulletinc.43>from IERS. Looking back at the last five years or so of the archived announcements <ftp://hpiers.obspm.fr/iers/bul/bulc/>, it seems they've used -26 and -29 almost interchangeably, going back and forth more than a few times. (I wouldn't worry.) -- Tim Parenti On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 12:31, Ángel González <keisial@gmail.com> wrote:
On 06/01/12 11:54, Zefram wrote:
Bulletin C 43 came out yesterday, scheduling a leap second for the end of June 2012. Patch attached. -zefram
--- leapseconds 2012-01-06 10:47:32.000000000 +0000 +++ leapseconds.new 2012-01-06 10:49:42.000000000 +0000 @@ -48,40 +48,53 @@ Leap 1998 Dec 31 23:59:60 + S Leap 2005 Dec 31 23:59:60 + S Leap 2008 Dec 31 23:59:60 + S +Leap 2012 Jun 30 23:59:60 + S
-# INTERNATIONAL EARTH ROTATION AND REFERENCE SYSTEMS SERVICE (IERS) +# INTERNATIONAL EARTH ROTATION AND REFERENCE SYSTEMS SERVICE (IERS) # # SERVICE INTERNATIONAL DE LA ROTATION TERRESTRE ET DES SYSTEMES DE REFERENCE # # SERVICE DE LA ROTATION TERRESTRE # OBSERVATOIRE DE PARIS # 61, Av. de l'Observatoire 75014 PARIS (France) -# Tel. : 33 (0) 1 40 51 22 29 +# Tel. : 33 (0) 1 40 51 22 26 # FAX : 33 (0) 1 40 51 22 91 -# Internet : services.iers@obspm.fr +# e-mail : services.iers@obspm.fr +# http://hpiers.obspm.fr/eop-pc
Is the change of telephone number intentional? The number stated in http://hpiers.obspm.fr/eop-pc/ is 00 33 (0)1 40 51 22 29 (the old one).
Date: Thu, 09 Feb 2012 11:53:43 +0100 From: Petr Machata <pmachata@redhat.com> Message-ID: <m2pqdonuq0.fsf@redhat.com> | akuster <akuster@mvista.com> writes: | > is there going to be an official release for this issue ? | | My question as well. Or are we waiting for another zone change? here is an update due, and the leap second update is in it already. The Armenian change I'd like a little more confirmation of, if that's possible, those changes seem to be frequently postulated, but less often actually occur. It is certainly a possibility, but something more than an announcement of an intention would be nice to see, Finally, apologies for not having made the promised update near the beginning of the year, there is nothing major (urgent) in it yet, but it should have appeared before now. I am working on it, but a little short of time at the minute (for the next week or so, after that less of a problem for the next couple of months at least). kre
On 2012-02-09 22:08, Robert Elz wrote:
Date: Thu, 09 Feb 2012 11:53:43 +0100 From: Petr Machata <pmachata at redhat.com> Message-ID: <m2pqdonuq0.fsf at redhat.com>
| akuster <akuster at mvista.com> writes: | > is there going to be an official release for this issue ? | | My question as well. Or are we waiting for another zone change?
here is an update due, and the leap second update is in it already. The Armenian change I'd like a little more confirmation of, if that's possible, those changes seem to be frequently postulated, but less often actually occur. It is certainly a possibility, but something more than an announcement of an intention would be nice to see,
Please also add the following. I don't have the book from Le Corre, but i can read maps and recognize typos in names of French cities. I've also exchanged Dole and Arbois. Denis Excoffier. diff -cNr 0/europe 1/europe *** 0/europe Fri Oct 28 11:58:45 2011 --- 1/europe Sun Feb 12 14:53:54 2012 *************** *** 1150,1160 **** # The French rules for 1941-1944 were not used in Paris, but Shanks & Pottenger # write that they were used in Monaco and in many French locations. # Le Corre writes that the upper limit of the free zone was Arneguy, Orthez, ! # Mont-de-Marsan, Bazas, Langon, Lamotte-Montravel, Marouil, La ! # Rochefoucault, Champagne-Mouton, La Roche-Posay, La Haye-Decartes, # Loches, Montrichard, Vierzon, Bourges, Moulins, Digoin, ! # Paray-le-Monial, Montceau-les-Mines, Chalons-sur-Saone, Arbois, ! # Dole, Morez, St-Claude, and Collognes (Haute-Savioe). Rule France 1941 only - May 5 0:00 2:00 M # Midsummer # Shanks & Pottenger say this transition occurred at Oct 6 1:00, # but go with Denis Excoffier (1997-12-12), --- 1150,1160 ---- # The French rules for 1941-1944 were not used in Paris, but Shanks & Pottenger # write that they were used in Monaco and in many French locations. # Le Corre writes that the upper limit of the free zone was Arneguy, Orthez, ! # Mont-de-Marsan, Bazas, Langon, Lamothe-Montravel, Mareuil, La ! # Rochefoucauld, Champagne-Mouton, La Roche-Posay, La Haye-Descartes, # Loches, Montrichard, Vierzon, Bourges, Moulins, Digoin, ! # Paray-le-Monial, Montceau-les-Mines, Chalon-sur-Saone, Dole, Arbois, ! # Morez, Saint-Claude, and Collonges (Haute-Savoie). Rule France 1941 only - May 5 0:00 2:00 M # Midsummer # Shanks & Pottenger say this transition occurred at Oct 6 1:00, # but go with Denis Excoffier (1997-12-12),
Thanks. Assuming that there's no-one here who knows French geography and objects to these changes (that would certainly not be me), they should appear in the next update. kre
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2012 07:36:25 -0800 From: akuster <akuster@mvista.com> Message-ID: <4F465CF9.5050808@mvista.com> | So when is the next update targeted? Very soon now. Tim Parenti has been kind enough to send me what looks to be everything needed for a tzdata update, I just need to flush out all the obsolete refs I can find in the html (and other docs) and make a tzcode update to go with it (no C code changes in this one, as I mentioned before). Expect to see an advance copy of the planned update for review early next week (perhaps even sometime over the weekend) - if it doesn't appear, feel free to hassle me about it! kre
participants (7)
-
akuster -
Denis Excoffier -
Petr Machata -
Robert Elz -
Tim Parenti -
Zefram -
Ángel González