And while we're on that subject, there are several lastSuns and a lastSat in Zone entries (which inherently refer to just one occurrence). Would it be better to replace those with the appropriate actual days? -----Original Message----- From: Paul Eggert [mailto:eggert@CS.UCLA.EDU] Sent: Wed 22 February 2006 13:30 To: tz@lecserver.nci.nih.gov Subject: Re: First Sunday Jesper Norgaard Welen <jnorgard@prodigy.net.mx> writes:
I would recommend using "Sun>=1", because I think it is clearer.
Thanks for the suggestion. I'll remove the "<="s in my next proposed patch. There are also instances of "Mon<=7", "Sat<=7", "Sun<=14", "Sun<=21", and "Sun<=24", which can all be rewritten.
On 22 Feb 2006 at 13:45, Andy Lipscomb wrote:
And while we're on that subject, there are several lastSuns and a lastSat in Zone entries (which inherently refer to just one occurrence). Would it be better to replace those with the appropriate actual days?
Maybe, but that won't work for a rule indicating lastSun in February which may be in effect both during leap years and during non-leap years. (I didn't check -- I'm guessing that there are none.) Dave C. -- Dave Cantor Groton, CT 06340-3731 Dave@Cantor.mv.com
participants (2)
-
Andy Lipscomb -
Dave Cantor