Back on 9 June when I mentioned Nigel Beard's Lighter Evenings Bill I wrote:

I haven't found the text of the Bill itself yet. It will probably turn up on the Parliament website next week.

It was finally published on Wednesday. PDF and HTML versions can be found at <http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200304/cmbills/115/2004115.htm>. It is a short Bill of only four sections. It changes the time for general purposes to one hour in advance of GMT. It amends the Scotland Act 1998 to make time zones and summer time arrangements a devolved rather than a reserved matter, which will allow the Scottish parliament to keep Scotland on GMT if they so wish. It makes some amendments to the Summer Time Act 1972 which I presume are to allow Northern Ireland, the Channel Islands and the Isle of Man to do their own thing as well (I don't have a copy of the 1972 Act handy to check this). By pure coincidence a relative of mine works as a researcher for Nigel Beard and has spent the last couple of months working on this. What seems to have happened is that Nigel became convinced by the safety arguments for change and decided to do something about it. At this stage he didn't know about John Butterfill's `Extra Daylight' Bill or Lord Archer's similar measure that he introduced during his doomed campaign for London mayoral candidate. Finding all this out was left to his researcher. She produced a briefing which Nigel's ten minute rule speech was based on. In turn, she then passed the specification for the proposed change on to the parliamentary draughtsmen, who add the legalese so it will pass muster as a Bill. The next stage is the Bill's second reading, which is set for 15 October. This is where the first vote on the Bill will take place. If the vote is lost that's it. If it passes the Bill goes to the next, committee, stage. If you look at the Public Bill List on the Parliament website (<http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm/cmpblist/cmpblist.htm>) you will see that there are literally dozens of Bills down for second reading on 15 October. The second reading is supposed to be the first detailed consideration of a Bill. You can judge for yourselves what sort of scrutiny each of these dozens of Bills will get. My view remains that this Bill has almost no chance of becoming law. Ten minute rule Bills come even further down the pecking order than private members' Bills like John Butterfill's one, and his failed. Bills like this only really stand a chance if they have government support, as the government can give them parliamentary time. I have spoken to someone at the DTI (the department now dealing with time related stuff) and they told me that the government is not in favour of this change, as it would be disruptive to business, transport and tourism, particularly if the UK no longer used a single time zone. Peter Ilieve peter@aldie.co.uk