On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 7:08 AM, Christos Zoulas
<christos@zoulas.com> wrote:
On Oct 26, 11:22pm, eggert@cs.ucla.edu (Paul Eggert) wrote:
-- Subject: [tz] tzcode2012h and tzdata2012h available
| More C modernization, except that at Arthur David Olson's suggestion
| the instances of 'register' were kept.
Wonderful. Will you accept a patch then to add all the missing
"register" adornments (because that is what they are) for the rest
of the variables whose address is not taken? And please, point out
to me another opensource package that still uses register, because
I am stressed to find one.
Don't stress; ignore the register annotations. And no, adorning everything that does not have its address taken with register would not be sensible.
I hope Paul won't accept the patch; I recommend not even bothering to create it. Relax. The presence of the register keyword won't hurt anything.