On 05.11.21 16:26, Brian Park via tz wrote:
Can you explain why [no ISO countries]? Because it will cause arguments about disputed places? I think only a small minority of places around the world are disputed.

Over the time I have been following this group:

I'm sure I'm missing a few.

You may say that these are a minority of nations, but these changes have NOT by themselves necessitated ANY work on the part of this project.  That is a feature.  To be clear, that work would involve someone taking a political stance, even if that means supporting UN decisions (that's a political decision).  Better to stick with what we have: observe what people on the ground think the time is.

Eliot